Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06815

Introduced
2/18/15  
Introduced
2/18/15  
Refer
2/18/15  
Refer
2/18/15  
Report Pass
3/23/15  
Report Pass
3/23/15  
Refer
4/1/15  
Refer
4/1/15  
Report Pass
4/8/15  
Report Pass
4/8/15  
Engrossed
5/5/15  
Report Pass
5/7/15  
Report Pass
5/7/15  
Chaptered
6/2/15  
Chaptered
6/2/15  
Enrolled
6/10/15  
Enrolled
6/10/15  
Passed
6/19/15  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Definition And Use Of The Term "intellectual Disability".

Impact

If enacted, HB 6815 will have a significant impact on various laws pertaining to the support and services provided to individuals with intellectual disabilities. Specifically, it will repeal sections of the general statutes that include the term 'mental retardation' and replace it with 'intellectual disability'. This change will affect the regulations governing state programs and services which are designed for individuals with these disabilities, potentially influencing funding and resource allocation.

Summary

House Bill 6815 aims to redefine and clarify the use of the term 'intellectual disability' in state law, replacing the outdated term 'mental retardation'. This bill seeks to ensure that the language used in legislation aligns with current understandings of intellectual disabilities and promotes respectful and accurate terminology. By amending existing statutes, the bill underscores the importance of using terms that reflect the dignity of individuals with disabilities and fosters a more inclusive society.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 6815 appears to be predominantly positive, with advocates praising the move as a necessary update that aligns state law with contemporary views on intellectual disabilities. Supporters argue that this change is crucial for combating stigma and ensuring that individuals with intellectual disabilities are recognized and supported appropriately. However, there is a recognition of the potential pushback from certain groups that may resist changes in terminology and the implications these changes have on systemic structures.

Contention

Some contention may arise from debates regarding the impact of language on policy and funding mechanisms. While proponents of the bill argue that the updated terminology is necessary for fostering a supportive environment for individuals with intellectual disabilities, critics may question how effectively these changes will translate into improved services and support. Additionally, there may be discussions around the resources needed to implement this change across various state departments.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.