Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06944

Introduced
2/27/15  
Introduced
2/27/15  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Timely Refund Of Inadvertent Property Tax Payments.

Impact

The bill mandates that municipalities issue refunds to applicants within thirty days of receiving a proper application. It specifies the conditions under which refunds may be granted, including circumstances of overpayment due to clerical errors or an exemption that applies to the taxpayer. This change is significant as it simplifies and accelerates the resolution of property tax overpayment issues, potentially reducing taxpayer dissatisfaction and fostering greater transparency in municipal financial operations.

Summary

House Bill 06944, titled 'An Act Concerning The Timely Refund Of Inadvertent Property Tax Payments', addresses the need for municipalities to refund property tax overpayments made inadvertently by taxpayers. The legislation aims to streamline the process by which taxpayers can apply for refunds on excess payments and is intended to ensure that these refunds are processed in a timely manner. The proposed amendment to Section 12-129 of the general statutes sets clear guidelines for how taxpayers can file claims, including a timeline for submission and a mechanism for certification of refunds by tax collectors.

Contention

While the bill is primarily aimed at improving taxpayer rights and municipal accountability, it may also be subject to contention. Some stakeholders may question the administrative burden this places on municipal tax collectors and the implications of such guaranteed turnaround timelines on local government cash flows. There could be concerns raised by local municipalities regarding their budgeting constraints and ability to process refunds under the stipulated timeframes without causing disruptions to their operations.

Notable points

The act outlines that any payment for which no timely application is made shall permanently remain with the municipality, thereby incentivizing prompt action from taxpayers. Furthermore, any errors of judgment made by tax assessors would not be grounds for a refund, maintaining a level of protection for assessors while balancing the rights of taxpayers.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.