Connecticut House Bill HB06997

Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/11/15
• Refer: 3/11/15
• Report Pass: 3/25/15
• Refer: 4/6/15
• Report Pass: 4/13/15
• Engrossed: 5/13/15
• Report Pass: 5/15/15
• Chaptered: 6/15/15
• Enrolled: 6/18/15
• Passed: 7/2/15

Caption

An Act Implementing The State Board Of Accountancy's Recommendation To Redefine "attest" And "report".

Impact

One of the significant impacts of HB 06997 is its effect on the operational requirements for public accountants in the state. By establishing clearer definitions and parameters for the issuance of 'reports', the bill seeks to ensure that only properly licensed firms and individuals can engage in significant financial reporting and attest activities. This change aims to protect consumers and improve the quality of accounting services by ensuring that only qualified practitioners are involved in these critical functions.

Summary

House Bill 06997, also known as An Act Implementing the State Board of Accountancy's Recommendation to Redefine 'attest' and 'report', amends certain definitions and provisions related to public accountancy in the state. It focuses particularly on redefining what constitutes 'attest' and 'report' within the context of accountancy services. The bill seeks to clarify these terms to align with current practices and standards in the accountancy profession, thereby enhancing the regulatory framework governing public accountants and their activities.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 06997 has been positive among accounting professionals and industry stakeholders. Many view this bill as a necessary reform that modernizes the accountancy framework to better reflect current practices and requirements. By providing clarity on the definitions and requirements for public accountants, proponents believe it will enhance the professionalism and integrity of the field.

Contention

Despite the generally favorable reception, there are points of contention regarding the bill's implementation and the potential regulatory burden it may impose on smaller firms or newly established accountants. Some critics argue that the stringent definitions and permit requirements could limit access to the profession for aspiring accountants and may create barriers that disproportionately affect smaller operations. The debate underscores the ongoing tension between ensuring high standards in accountancy and fostering an inclusive environment for new practitioners.