Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB07021

Introduced
3/12/15  
Introduced
3/12/15  
Refer
3/12/15  
Report Pass
3/25/15  
Refer
4/7/15  
Refer
4/7/15  
Report Pass
4/14/15  
Report Pass
4/14/15  
Engrossed
6/1/15  
Report Pass
6/1/15  
Report Pass
6/1/15  
Chaptered
6/17/15  
Chaptered
6/17/15  
Enrolled
6/26/15  
Enrolled
6/26/15  
Passed
7/10/15  

Caption

An Act Concerning Teacher Preparation Program Efficacy.

Impact

This legislation significantly impacts state education policies by holding higher education institutions accountable for the efficacy of their teacher preparation programs. By requiring annual assessments, it seeks to ensure that graduates not only meet certification requirements but also positively influence their students' learning outcomes. This emphasis on measurable effectiveness is intended to enhance the overall quality of teaching in Connecticut's public schools.

Summary

House Bill 07021, titled 'An Act Concerning Teacher Preparation Program Efficacy,' aims to enhance the quality of teacher preparation programs in Connecticut. Enacted on July 1, 2015, the bill mandates that the Department of Education submit an annual report detailing the effectiveness of these programs. The report is required to cover various crucial metrics, including student achievement data from graduates, teaching performance measures, retention rates, and employment figures, in addition to suggestions focusing on the recruitment of minority educators.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 07021 is largely positive among educational administrators and policymakers who see it as a proactive step toward improving teacher quality. Supporters believe that by focusing on concrete data regarding teacher performance and student outcomes, the bill will ultimately lead to better educational experiences for students. However, there might be reservations regarding the feasibility of implementing rigorous assessments, particularly in terms of resource allocation for the required evaluations.

Contention

While the bill has garnered support for its focus on accountability, some educators express concerns about the potential stress and challenges of continuous evaluation. There is apprehension that an overemphasis on quantifiable metrics might not fully capture the diverse and complex nature of teaching effectiveness. Critics may argue that the focus on specific data points could overshadow the need for holistic approaches to education, particularly in addressing the recruitment of minority educators and providing equitable learning opportunities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.