Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00007

Introduced
1/7/15  
Refer
1/7/15  
Refer
1/14/15  
Refer
1/14/15  
Report Pass
2/10/15  
Report Pass
2/10/15  
Refer
2/13/15  
Refer
2/13/15  
Report Pass
2/20/15  
Report Pass
2/20/15  
Engrossed
4/22/15  
Engrossed
4/22/15  
Report Pass
4/24/15  

Caption

An Act Concerning Health Insurance Coverage Of Orally And Intravenously Administered Medications.

Impact

If enacted, SB00007 will amend state insurance regulations to require that coverage for orally assimilated medications cannot be less favorable than for similar therapeutics administered intravenously. This legislative change aims to enhance access to necessary treatments for chronic conditions, ensuring that patients who rely on oral medications receive the same level of insurance coverage and financial protection as those who require intravenous medications. The bill's implementation is projected to lead to improved health outcomes through increased adherence to prescribed therapies.

Summary

SB00007, also known as An Act Concerning Health Insurance Coverage of Orally and Intravenously Administered Medications, mandates that health insurance providers in the state cover orally administered medications equitably alongside intravenously administered medications for the treatment or palliation of chronic diseases. The bill is designed to ensure that patients have access to effective therapies irrespective of the method of administration, thereby promoting fairness in health care coverage.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding SB00007 appears to be positive, particularly from patient advocacy groups and healthcare providers who emphasize the importance of equitable treatment options for patients. Supporters argue that the bill addresses substantial gaps in healthcare access and affordability. However, there may be some concerns from insurance companies about potential increases in operational costs due to expanded coverage requirements.

Contention

Debate surrounding SB00007 could focus on the implications for insurance premiums and the financial viability of health insurers. Critics might argue that mandating this coverage could lead to higher costs passed to consumers or could potentially reduce insurance provider options in the marketplace. The bill effectively emphasizes the ongoing debate about balancing healthcare accessibility with economic considerations in the insurance sector.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.