Connecticut Senate Bill SB00234

Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/21/15
• Refer: 1/21/15
• Refer: 2/5/15
• Report Pass: 2/25/15
• Refer: 3/4/15
• Report Pass: 3/10/15
• Refer: 5/14/15

Caption

An Act Requiring Health Insurance Coverage For The Purchase Of Assistance Dogs.

Impact

The implementation of SB00234 is set to provide a significant change in how health insurance operates concerning support animals. By explicitly allowing reimbursement for the purchase of assistance dogs, the bill would enhance access to these vital support tools for a broader range of individuals with disabilities. This could lead to increased independence and improved quality of life for those who require such assistance, potentially reducing the need for other more costly treatments or interventions related to mental health and mobility.

Summary

SB00234 is an act aimed at requiring health insurance policies to cover the costs associated with purchasing assistance dogs specifically trained to aid individuals with disabilities. This includes not only those who are visually impaired or deaf but also those suffering from non-physical disabilities such as anxiety disorders and post-traumatic stress disorder. The bill mandates that such coverage is contingent upon the certification of medical necessity from the insured's healthcare provider, ensuring that the assistance dog is deemed essential for the health and well-being of the individual.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB00234 seems to be positive, with support from disability advocates and those in the health care community. The bill is viewed as a progressive step towards ensuring that individuals with disabilities have access to necessary resources that facilitate their daily living. However, there may be concerns raised by insurance companies regarding the potential financial implications of extended coverage for assistance dogs, which could lead to increased premiums or changes in policy offerings.

Contention

A point of contention could arise around the definition of 'medical necessity,' as it requires healthcare provider certification. Discussions may focus on how strictly this certification will be regulated and whether it could create barriers for individuals seeking assistance. Additionally, there might be debates about the training standards required for assistance dogs and whether all insurance policies will implement these changes uniformly. As the bill moves forward, these discussions will be crucial in shaping how the legislation is enacted and its eventual impact on the community.