Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00384

Introduced
1/22/15  
Introduced
1/22/15  
Refer
1/22/15  
Refer
1/22/15  
Refer
3/3/15  
Refer
3/3/15  
Report Pass
3/9/15  
Refer
3/17/15  
Report Pass
3/24/15  
Report Pass
3/24/15  
Engrossed
4/8/15  
Report Pass
4/9/15  
Passed
4/14/15  
Passed
4/14/15  
Chaptered
4/17/15  
Chaptered
4/17/15  
Enrolled
4/22/15  

Caption

An Act Permitting The Waiver Of State Agency Electronic Filing Requirements And Concerning Special Elections For Mayoral Vacancies.

Impact

The enactment of SB 384 is expected to make a significant impact on communication between state agencies and the public, particularly for individuals who may have complications with electronic filings. By allowing waivers, the bill aims to accommodate a wider range of citizens, thereby enhancing accessibility to governmental processes. Furthermore, the standardization of special election processes for mayors in larger municipalities is designed to ensure that such vacancies do not remain unfilled for extended periods, thereby promoting stability in local governance.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 384, also referred to as Public Act No. 15-1, addresses two primary issues: the waiver of electronic filing requirements by state agencies and the procedures for special elections to fill mayoral vacancies in municipalities over 60,000 in population. The bill allows for state agencies to waive electronic filing requirements if a client demonstrates good cause, thus providing flexibility to individuals or businesses unable to comply with electronic submission mandates. Additionally, the bill sets forth specific regulations concerning how municipalities should handle mayoral vacancies, ensuring a timely election to fill such positions.

Sentiment

Sentiment surrounding SB 384 appeared largely supportive, with members of the legislature recognizing the need for flexibility in state agency requirements and the importance of maintaining effective local governance. The bill received overwhelming support during the voting process, indicating a consensus among lawmakers about the value of addressing the unique needs of both state agencies and municipal governance. The absence of opposition during the voting proceedings suggests broad agreement on the bill's objectives.

Contention

While the bill passed without opposition, potential points of contention may arise in the implementation of its provisions, particularly around what constitutes 'good cause' for waiving electronic filing requirements. Such stipulations may lead to varying interpretations by different agencies, which could affect consistency across statewide policies. Additionally, the expedited timelines for special elections may place pressure on local governments, necessitating readiness to act swiftly when vacancies arise.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.