| Old | New | Differences | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | General Assembly Proposed Bill No. 564 | |
| 2 | 2 | January Session, 2015 LCO No. 1939 | |
| 3 | 3 | *01939* | |
| 4 | 4 | Referred to Committee on EDUCATION | |
| 5 | 5 | Introduced by: | |
| 6 | 6 | SEN. KISSEL, 7th Dist. | |
| 7 | 7 | ||
| 8 | 8 | General Assembly | |
| 9 | 9 | ||
| 10 | 10 | Proposed Bill No. 564 | |
| 11 | 11 | ||
| 12 | 12 | January Session, 2015 | |
| 13 | 13 | ||
| 14 | 14 | LCO No. 1939 | |
| 15 | 15 | ||
| 16 | 16 | *01939* | |
| 17 | 17 | ||
| 18 | 18 | Referred to Committee on EDUCATION | |
| 19 | 19 | ||
| 20 | 20 | Introduced by: | |
| 21 | 21 | ||
| 22 | 22 | SEN. KISSEL, 7th Dist. | |
| 23 | 23 | ||
| 24 | 24 | AN ACT REPEALING THE REQUIREMENT THAT TOWNS BE FINANCIALLY RESPONSIBLE FOR INTERDISTRICT MAGNET SCHOOL TUITION. | |
| 25 | 25 | ||
| 26 | 26 | Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened: | |
| 27 | 27 | ||
| 28 | 28 | That chapter 172 of the general statutes be amended to eliminate the requirement that towns pay tuition to interdistrict magnet school operators and regional educational services centers for the operation of interdistrict magnet schools and to require the state to pay such tuition. | |
| 29 | 29 | ||
| 30 | 30 | Statement of Purpose: | |
| 31 | 31 | ||
| 32 | 32 | To remove local costs associated with interdistrict magnet school tuition. |