Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00589

Introduced
1/22/15  
Refer
1/22/15  
Refer
1/22/15  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Unauthorized Access Of Consumer Data.

Impact

The implementation of SB00589 is expected to substantially change the regulatory landscape concerning data privacy and security in the state. By requiring organizations to encrypt personal information, the bill sets a new standard that aims to enhance consumer protection. Institutions will need to invest in security upgrades and training to comply with the law. Moreover, the legislation imposes penalties for failing to notify affected individuals in the event of a data breach, which emphasizes the accountability of these entities in safeguarding customer information.

Summary

SB00589, entitled 'An Act Concerning the Unauthorized Access of Consumer Data', is a legislative effort aimed at strengthening the protection of personal information held by entities such as insurance companies, banks, and data brokers. The bill mandates that these organizations implement robust security technologies, including encryption, to safeguard consumer data. By establishing this requirement, the bill aims to reduce the risks associated with unauthorized access to sensitive personal information and enhance consumer trust in financial and healthcare institutions.

Sentiment

Discussions surrounding SB00589 have generally been supportive, with strong backing from consumer advocacy groups that view the bill as a necessary step toward enhancing data security. The sentiment reflects a consensus on the importance of protecting consumer data, especially amid rising concerns over identity theft and cybercrime. However, some industry representatives have expressed worries about the costs associated with compliance and the feasibility of meeting the encryption requirements within the stipulated timeline.

Contention

The bill has sparked a debate regarding the balance between consumer protection and the operational burdens placed on businesses. Some critics argue that the encryption mandate may be overly stringent, especially for smaller entities that might struggle with the financial implications of compliance. Furthermore, there are concerns about the practicality of enforcing the notification requirements, particularly if the breach occurs through sophisticated cyber attacks that may not be easily detected or reported within the seven-day window set by the bill. This tension illustrates the ongoing challenges in formulating legislation that effectively addresses privacy concerns while being mindful of the operational realities facing businesses.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.