Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00636

Introduced
1/23/15  
Introduced
1/23/15  
Refer
1/23/15  
Refer
3/23/15  
Report Pass
3/24/15  
Refer
4/1/15  
Refer
4/1/15  
Report Pass
4/8/15  
Report Pass
4/8/15  
Engrossed
5/19/15  

Caption

An Act Concerning Affirmative Consent.

Impact

The bill mandates that educational institutions in Connecticut implement awareness and prevention programming regarding sexual assault, stalking, and intimate partner violence. Institutions are required to inform students and staff about the affirmative consent standard, ensure that individuals understand their rights and the reporting mechanisms available to them, and promote a campus culture that actively discourages assault through clear educational campaigns.

Summary

Substitute Bill No. 636, also known as the Act Concerning Affirmative Consent, primarily addresses the issue of consent in sexual relationships within institutions of higher education. The bill establishes a clear definition of 'affirmative consent' as an active, unambiguous, and voluntary agreement to engage in sexual activity that is required to be preserved throughout the encounter. This move is aimed at creating a more informed environment regarding sexual activities on campuses, where all parties must ensure they have received explicit consent.

Sentiment

The reception of Bill SB00636 has been largely positive among advocates for victims' rights and sexual assault prevention. Supporters argue that it provides necessary protections for students, establishes critical educational frameworks, and supports survivors by giving them clear options for reporting and pursuing justice. However, some critiques arise about the potential challenges in implementation, as institutions may struggle with the requirements of reporting and ensuring adherence to the new standards.

Contention

Notable contention regarding the bill stems from concerns over the practical implications of the affirmative consent standard, particularly in relation to how it will be enforced. Some stakeholders express worry that the requirement may complicate investigations and disciplinary actions following reports of sexual misconduct. Others highlight the potential cultural shift required within colleges to adopt these standards, advocating for comprehensive training and resources to ensure that the intent of the bill translates effectively into practice.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ A452

Establishes position of Ombudsman of Student Discipline to serve within Office of the Secretary of Higher Education.

NJ A388

Establishes position of Ombudsman of Student Discipline to serve within Office of the Secretary of Higher Education.

CA AB888

Charitable raffles.

SC H3486

Student and Administration Equality Act

OK SB633

Higher education; creating the Student and Administration Equality Act; providing for disciplinary proceedings. Effective date. Emergency.

IN HB1479

Student disciplinary proceedings.

LA HB364

Provides relative to disciplinary proceedings for students enrolled in public postsecondary education institutions and student-led organizations

KY HB290

AN ACT relating to student discipline at public postsecondary education institutions.