Connecticut Senate Bill SB00831

Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/28/15
• Refer: 1/28/15
• Refer: 3/19/15
• Report Pass: 3/27/15
• Refer: 4/10/15
• Report Pass: 4/16/15
• Refer: 4/22/15
• Report Pass: 4/27/15
• Report Pass: 4/28/15
• Refer: 5/5/15
• Report Pass: 5/7/15
• Refer: 5/19/15

Caption

An Act Eliminating The Municipal Exemption From The Contract Compliance Requirements In State Contracts.

Impact

The bill proposes to set aside at least twenty-five percent of the total value of contracts awarded by state agencies for small contractors and minority business enterprises in each fiscal year. It stipulates eligibility criteria and establishes accountability measures for agencies, which must report their progress toward these set-aside goals. This legislative change is expected to enhance economic opportunities for underrepresented groups and ensure that government contracts contribute to broader economic equity across the state. By reinforcing these compliance requirements, the bill aligns state contracting processes with principles of fairness and inclusion.

Summary

Substitute Bill No. 831, introduced during the January session of 2015, aims to eliminate the municipal exemption from contract compliance requirements associated with state contracts. The proposed legislation intends to amend existing statutes to ensure that small contractors and minority business enterprises have equal access to public contracts financed in whole or part by the state. This is particularly relevant for construction and maintenance projects related to public buildings and infrastructure. The bill reflects a legislative determination acknowledging a significant need for supporting these groups in gaining opportunities for government contracts, thereby fostering inclusivity in public procurement processes.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00831 appears supportive among advocates for minority representation in government contracts and small business proponents. Supporters argue that the bill is an essential step toward rectifying systemic barriers faced by these businesses when competing for state contracts. However, there may be apprehension from some municipal stakeholders who could view the removal of exemptions as an additional burden on their administrative capabilities and efficiency in handling local contracts. Overall, the prevailing sentiment emphasizes the importance of equity in public contracting.

Contention

Discussion points of contention could arise regarding the fiscal implications for municipalities and state agencies as they adapt to the new compliance requirements set forth in the bill. Concerns have been expressed about potential bureaucratic hurdles and the capacity of smaller agencies to meet the reporting and compliance standards outlined in the legislation. As the bill progresses, further debate is expected over how these requirements may impact contract timeliness and availability of funding for community projects, which could affect local governance and operational freedoms.