Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00870

Introduced
2/5/15  
Introduced
2/5/15  
Refer
2/5/15  
Refer
2/5/15  
Report Pass
2/27/15  
Refer
3/10/15  
Refer
3/10/15  
Report Pass
3/17/15  
Report Pass
3/17/15  
Refer
4/14/15  
Refer
4/14/15  
Report Pass
4/20/15  
Report Pass
4/20/15  
Report Pass
4/21/15  
Report Pass
4/21/15  
Engrossed
5/6/15  
Engrossed
5/6/15  
Report Pass
5/7/15  
Report Pass
5/7/15  
Chaptered
6/8/15  
Enrolled
6/11/15  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Duties Of Animal Control Officers.

Impact

The implementation of SB 870 is expected to have a significant impact on state laws regarding animal control and welfare. By providing a standardized set of regulations for animal control officers, the bill aims to ensure that all municipalities maintain a minimum level of care and responsibility in their animal control operations. This is particularly relevant for ensuring humane treatment of animals and providing proper facilities for their care when impounded. The bill may also enhance public trust in animal control practices by creating clearer accountability measures and protocols for addressing complaints against officers.

Summary

Senate Bill 870 addresses the duties of animal control officers in managing domestic animals, particularly dogs. The bill establishes clear guidelines for the appointment and responsibilities of municipal animal control officers, ensuring they are adequately trained and authorized to enforce laws related to the treatment of animals. This includes guidelines on impounding animals, dealing with stray or mistreated pets, and mandates for notifying owners when their animals are taken into custody. The bill aims to provide a more structured approach to handling animal control issues in municipalities, which is crucial for the welfare of these animals and the community's safety.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SB 870 appears to be generally favorable, reflecting a growing recognition of the need for better animal welfare standards and enforcement mechanisms. Supporters argue that the bill is a positive step towards improving the treatment of domestic animals and addressing concerns related to animal neglect and abuse. However, there are some reservations regarding the potential costs involved in implementing these changes and whether municipalities will have adequate resources to comply with the new regulations. Overall, the bill is seen as a progressive measure aligning with public interest in animal welfare.

Contention

One notable point of contention relates to the balance between enforcing stricter regulations and ensuring that municipalities are equipped to comply with them without overburdening local budgets. Some critics question whether the resources allocated for implementation will be sufficient, fearing that without proper funding, municipalities might struggle to meet the standards set by the bill. Additionally, there is concern regarding how effectively complaints against animal control officers can be investigated and whether the proposed oversight measures will be adequately enforced.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT HB06726

An Act Concerning The Regulation Of Livestock.

ME LD528

An Act to Address the Rise in Rabies in Animals by Appointing Certified Rabies Vaccine Administrators

CT HB06504

An Act Concerning Animal Welfare.

LA HB510

Provides relative to the Louisiana Board of Animal Health

CT HB05836

An Act Concerning The Availability Of Funding For The Vaccination And Sterilization Of Dogs And Cats Owned By Low Income Persons.

CT HB05223

An Act Concerning Minor Revisions To Agriculture Related Statutes And To Open Space Acquisition Related Statutes.

CT HB07297

An Act Concerning Quarantine And Disposal Orders Of Animal Control Officers.

CO SB045

Modifications to Sterilization Requirements for Cats & Dogs