Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB01028

Introduced
2/26/15  
Refer
2/26/15  
Report Pass
3/27/15  
Refer
4/9/15  
Report Pass
4/15/15  
Report Pass
4/15/15  
Engrossed
5/14/15  
Report Pass
5/15/15  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Tolling Of The Statute Of Limitations For A Negligence Action Brought By A Minor.

Impact

The bill modifies existing statutes, specifically Section 52-584, which outlines limitations on filing negligence claims. By enabling minors to file claims after they turn 18, the legislation seeks to alleviate the burden on young victims who may be unaware of their legal rights until they are older. This is particularly significant in cases where minors may not fully understand the implications of their injuries or the process involved in bringing a legal claim. As such, this bill is viewed as a means to enhance protections for minors who may suffer injuries due to neglect or malpractice.

Summary

SB01028 addresses the issue of the statute of limitations for negligence actions brought by minors. It aims to amend existing legislation to provide a more defined time frame in which minors can pursue legal actions for damages related to injury caused by negligence or malpractice. The key change introduced by the bill allows minors to file a lawsuit within one year of reaching the age of majority (18 years), extending the statutory time limit to eight years following the event that led to the injury. This adjustment is intended to ensure that injured minors have a fair opportunity to seek justice once they reach legal adulthood.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB01028 appears to be supportive among those advocating for children's rights and legal protections. Advocates emphasize that extending the statute of limitations for minors' negligence claims is a crucial step in ensuring that young victims receive proper recompense for their injuries and that they are given the opportunity to pursue legal action when appropriate. However, there could be concerns raised about potential ramifications for defendants facing claims many years after the fact, highlighting the complexity of balancing victim rights against the rights of defendants.

Contention

Although the bill has garnered support, it may also face scrutiny regarding the practical implications of extending the statute of limitations. Detractors of the bill might argue that allowing claims to be brought years after the incident could complicate legal proceedings and defend against claims that become harder to substantiate as time passes. Discussions around the bill may focus on finding a balance between protecting vulnerable individuals and ensuring that individuals and institutions are not unduly burdened by outdated allegations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.