Connecticut 2015 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB01097

Introduced
3/12/15  
Introduced
3/12/15  
Refer
3/12/15  
Refer
3/12/15  
Report Pass
3/25/15  
Refer
4/6/15  
Refer
4/6/15  
Report Pass
4/13/15  
Refer
4/22/15  
Report Pass
4/28/15  
Report Pass
4/28/15  
Report Pass
4/28/15  
Report Pass
4/30/15  
Report Pass
4/30/15  

Caption

An Act Concerning State Funding For Education.

Impact

Upon enactment, the bill would alter existing statutes that govern state funding for agricultural science education, specifically sections regarding the proportion of funding allocated based on application dates. For projects filed prior to July 1, 2011, districts would now receive up to ninety-five percent of net eligible costs, while those filed afterward would be eligible for eighty percent. Additionally, it allows for increased use of excess funds received from these grants, creating more flexibility for local boards of education in managing their budgets and funding priorities.

Summary

SB01097, titled 'An Act Concerning State Funding for Education', seeks to update and revise grant provisions for local and regional school districts operating agricultural science and technology education centers. The bill establishes eligibility criteria for grants aimed at supporting these educational centers, ensuring they receive a significant percentage of funding for construction, acquisition, and renovation projects. This approach is intended to bolster educational resources in agriculture and technology sectors, which are critical for promoting specialized education in Connecticut.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB01097 appears generally supportive within educational circles, particularly among advocates for agricultural education. Supporters argue that improved funding mechanisms will enhance the quality of agricultural education and ensure that students have access to modern facilities and equipment. However, there may be concerns from some local districts regarding the implications of altered funding strategies and their impact on local control over educational resources.

Contention

Notable contention arises around the adequacy of funding for various educational initiatives and the distribution methods employed by the state. Critics may argue that while the bill addresses funding for agricultural centers, it could inadvertently lead to disparities between different educational sectors or regions. There is a recognition that localized educational needs vary significantly, and the reliance on state frameworks for distributing funds could overlook unique community requirements.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.