Connecticut House Bill HB05308

Connecticut 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/18/16
• Refer: 2/18/16
• Report Pass: 3/16/16
• Refer: 3/28/16
• Report Pass: 4/4/16
• Engrossed: 4/12/16
• Report Pass: 4/14/16

Caption

An Act Concerning Revisions To The Department Of Education's Framework For Response To Intervention.

Impact

The bill is poised to impact state laws by formalizing structured interventions for students and establishing a standardized approach to education that focuses on research-based methodologies. By providing guidance on implementing a multitiered system of supports, HB 5308 reinforces the state's commitment to inclusive education and ensuring that all students, including those with disabilities, receive appropriate interventions. The requirement for professional development training for educators further highlights the bill's intention to improve instructional practices across schools.

Summary

House Bill 5308, concerning revisions to the Department of Education's Framework for Response to Intervention, aims to enhance educational support systems for students, particularly those requiring specialized interventions. Key provisions include recommendations for a high-quality core curriculum, positive school culture practices, and effective monitoring systems tailored for students receiving additional educational support. The bill mandates that the Department of Education review and update the existing framework to ensure it aligns with contemporary educational standards and practices by set deadlines in 2017 and 2018.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 5308 appears largely supportive, particularly among education advocates and practitioners who recognize the need for a cohesive framework to address the diverse needs of students. The emphasis on scientifically based interventions resonates positively with those who believe that tailored educational strategies can lead to better outcomes for students facing challenges. However, some concerns may arise surrounding the implementation of these standards and whether they can effectively address the varied educational landscapes across different districts.

Contention

Notable points of contention involving HB 5308 could arise regarding the adequacy of resources provided for the implementation of the revised framework and the potential variability in adherence among districts. While the bill aims to establish uniformity across schools, critics may argue that a blanket approach does not account for local needs and conditions. Additionally, the transition to the new framework may require careful planning and sufficient funding to ensure that all schools can effectively integrate the proposed recommendations.