Connecticut 2016 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05387

Introduced
2/24/16  
Refer
2/24/16  
Report Pass
3/11/16  
Refer
3/24/16  
Refer
3/24/16  
Report Pass
3/31/16  
Engrossed
4/13/16  
Engrossed
4/13/16  
Report Pass
4/15/16  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Circulation Of Nominating Petitions.

Impact

The bill is set to amend sections 9-453e, 9-453j, 9-453k(a), and 9-453o(a) of the general statutes. Among the notable amendments, it clarifies the eligibility criteria for circulators and enhances the requirements for statements on signature pages regarding circulator residency and authenticity. By reducing ambiguity in the process, it seeks to streamline the submission of nominating petitions and strengthen the legal framework that governs them, which could lead to a more efficient electoral process.

Summary

House Bill 05387 addresses the process and requirements surrounding the circulation of nominating petitions in Connecticut. The bill modifies existing statutes related to who can serve as a circulator of a nominating petition, establishing that circulators must be United States citizens, at least eighteen years old, and not on parole for felony convictions. This change aims to ensure the credibility and integrity of the signature collection process used in political nominations, reinforcing public confidence in electoral processes.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 05387 appears largely supportive, particularly among legislators who advocate for clean and transparent election practices. However, there may also be concerns from some candidates or organizations that rely heavily on grassroots support, as the tightened restrictions could pose challenges in gathering signatures. Overall, the sentiment reflects a desire for integrity in the electoral process, albeit with an awareness of the practical implications for potential candidates and their campaign efforts.

Contention

Some points of contention may arise regarding the implications of the new circulator requirements on participation rates among grassroots political movements. While enhancing the regulations can protect against fraudulent signatures and ensure that only qualified individuals gather support for candidates, critics might argue it could disenfranchise certain demographics, particularly if the requirements create barriers for volunteers. The balance between protecting election integrity and ensuring accessibility for diverse candidate support remains a critical part of the discourse surrounding HB 05387.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1170

Political Reform Act of 1974: filing requirements.

CA AB2051

Candidate’s statement.

CA AB2679

Fictitious business names: statements: publication.

CA AB515

Trial: statement of decision.

CA SB632

Vehicles: off-highway recreation: Red Rock Canyon State Park.

TX HB5377

Relating to the filing of a fraudulent financing statement in relation to certain secured transactions; authorizing the imposition of a fee.

TX SB2221

Relating to the filing of a fraudulent financing statement in relation to certain secured transactions; authorizing the imposition of a fee.

CA AB750

Crimes: perjury.