Connecticut 2016 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05401

Introduced
2/24/16  
Refer
2/24/16  
Report Pass
3/16/16  
Refer
3/28/16  
Refer
3/28/16  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Exclusion Of A Child's Name In Documents Relating To A Summary Process Action.

Impact

If enacted, HB 5401 would significantly impact how eviction records are maintained and accessed. This change would ensure that summary process judgments involving minors would not publicly disclose their names, thereby limiting the availability of this information and enhancing the protection for vulnerable children. The implications of this legislation may extend to how courts and landlords handle eviction cases involving families, as public disclosures could have lasting negative impacts on children’s lives.

Summary

House Bill 5401 aims to amend existing laws pertaining to the exclusion of a child's name in documents related to summary process actions, specifically in eviction and landlord-tenant disputes. By enabling court proceedings to exclude minors' names from public records, the bill seeks to protect the privacy of children involved in eviction cases. The act intends to mitigate the potential stigmatization of children whose families may be facing housing instability, thereby promoting a level of confidentiality and safeguarding against public exposure of sensitive family issues.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment regarding HB 5401 appears to be positive, as advocates for children's rights and family welfare support its intent to enhance privacy protections for minors. Many stakeholders recognize the importance of shielding children from the negative consequences associated with public eviction records. However, there may be concerns among landlords and real estate entities about potential challenges in enforcing eviction actions without full transparency in court records.

Contention

Some notable points of contention include the balance between landlord rights to enforce eviction procedures and the necessity to protect children's identities. While supporters view the bill as a necessary step toward child protection, opponents may argue that removing names from court records could hinder landlords' ability to perform due diligence when evaluating tenants and cause confusion during legal processes. This legislation invites ongoing discussions about the intersection of privacy rights and public accountability in housing law.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2713

Public employment: sexual harassment tracking.

CA SB342

Misleading advertising: domain and subdomain names.

CA SB820

Cannabis: enforcement: seizure of property.

CA SB1485

Consumer complaints.

CA AB2948

Consumer protection: Department of Consumer Affairs: complaints.

CA AB424

Alcohol and other drug programs: complaints.

CA AB1679

Motor vehicle insurance: auto body repair.

HI HB165

Relating To Internal Complaint Procedures.