Connecticut 2016 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05420

Introduced
2/25/16  
Refer
2/25/16  
Report Pass
4/7/16  
Refer
4/13/16  
Report Pass
4/19/16  
Report Pass
4/19/16  
Engrossed
4/27/16  
Engrossed
4/27/16  
Report Pass
4/28/16  
Report Pass
4/28/16  
Chaptered
5/16/16  
Chaptered
5/16/16  
Enrolled
5/20/16  
Enrolled
5/20/16  
Vetoed
6/3/16  

Caption

An Act Concerning Principal Investment Officers.

Impact

The bill will have implications for how pension funds are managed in Connecticut. By granting the Treasurer increased flexibility in appointing investment officers and determining their compensation, the bill aims to enhance the efficiency and effectiveness of the state's investment strategies. This could potentially lead to better management of public funds and improved financial returns for the state's retirement systems, which depend heavily on sound investment policies and practices.

Summary

House Bill 5420, titled 'An Act Concerning Principal Investment Officers', focuses on updating the management of investment personnel within the Connecticut retirement pension and trust funds. The bill modifies existing statutes to provide the state Treasurer with broader authority to appoint investment officers, including a chief investment officer and principal investment officers. This legislation allows the Treasurer to determine the compensation for these officers without the constraints of certain existing regulations, streamlining the process of selecting qualified personnel to manage state investments.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 5420 appears to be supportive among legislators who advocate for efficient management of state funds. The intent to empower the Treasurer aligns with a broader push for accountability and performance in public investment management. However, it highlights concerns among some critics about the implications of reducing legislative oversight concerning compensation and the appointment processes of investment personnel.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the oversight of the Treasurer's powers in setting compensation for the appointed officers. Critics may argue that removing certain constraints could lead to potential abuses in salary determinations or lack of accountability in investment decisions. The balance between efficient management and adequate oversight remains a focal point of discussion as this bill is considered within the legislative framework.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.