Connecticut 2016 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05435

Introduced
2/25/16  
Refer
2/25/16  
Report Pass
3/11/16  
Refer
3/18/16  
Report Pass
3/24/16  
Report Pass
3/24/16  
Engrossed
4/30/16  
Report Pass
4/30/16  
Chaptered
5/13/16  
Enrolled
5/18/16  
Enrolled
5/18/16  

Caption

An Act Concerning Consumers And Propane Fuel Providers.

Impact

The new regulations introduced by HB 5435 impact existing laws concerning propane providers by enforcing stricter contract requirements. Industry players, particularly heating fuel dealers, will now be required to provide potential customers with detailed information regarding their rights and options before entering into contractual commitments. This includes clauses that assure consumers are informed about any restrictions related to using other providers. The changes aim to prevent unfair contractual practices and ensure that customers have viable choices in a market that can often be monopolistic or exploitative.

Summary

House Bill 5435, titled 'An Act Concerning Consumers And Propane Fuel Providers,' was designed to enhance consumer protections in the propane fuel market. The bill mandates that all contracts related to the sale or lease of heating fuel and tanks incorporate specific terms that must be clearly stated and agreed upon by consumers. This includes the requirement for written contracts that articulate the full details of delivery terms, potential fees, and penalties. The intention behind this bill is to promote transparency and fairness for consumers who rely on propane fuel for heating needs.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 5435 appears largely supportive, especially from consumer advocacy groups who see the bill as a necessary step towards consumer protection in the propane market. The discussions reflect a recognition of the challenges faced by consumers in understanding complex contracts and the potential for exploitation by service providers. On the other hand, some propane dealers may argue that the increased regulations could hinder business operations and lead to higher compliance costs, though such concerns were not predominant in the discussions.

Contention

Notable points of contention primarily revolve around the provisions that restrict the enforceability of contract clauses preventing consumers from engaging with other propane providers. This regulation aims to ensure consumers are not locked into exclusive agreements without understanding their full implications. Critics of this aspect of the bill may argue that it challenges the operational flexibility of propane dealers. However, proponents emphasize the necessity of safeguarding consumer rights in an industry often criticized for lacking transparency.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT HB06048

An Act Concerning Refunds For Unused Heating Fuel.

CT SB00207

An Act Concerning Residential Heating Oil And Propane Contracts.

CA SB1068

Tri-Valley-San Joaquin Valley Regional Rail Authority: contracting: Construction Manager/General Contractor project delivery method.

CT HB05222

An Act Concerning Residential Retail Heating Oil And Propane Contracts.

CA AB2557

Local agencies: contracts for special services and temporary help: performance reports.

CA AB427

Otay Mesa East Toll Facility Act: alternative project delivery method.

CA AB2763

Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority: job order contracting.

CA AB942

California Advancing and Innovating Medi-Cal initiative.