Connecticut 2016 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05520

Introduced
3/2/16  
Introduced
3/2/16  
Refer
3/2/16  
Refer
3/2/16  
Report Pass
3/15/16  
Report Pass
3/15/16  
Refer
3/22/16  
Refer
3/22/16  
Report Pass
3/30/16  
Engrossed
4/21/16  
Engrossed
4/21/16  
Report Pass
4/25/16  
Report Pass
4/25/16  
Chaptered
5/19/16  
Chaptered
5/19/16  
Enrolled
5/25/16  

Caption

An Act Concerning Homeowners And Motor Vehicle Insurance Policies.

Impact

With an effective date of October 1, 2017, the bill represents a significant enhancement to consumer protections within the insurance domain. By obligating insurers to provide a mechanism for third-party notifications, the legislation seeks to shield vulnerable policyholders from losing critical insurance coverage without adequate notice. This is particularly relevant in cases where senior citizens may be less capable of managing these matters independently, thus addressing a pertinent gap in existing laws regarding consumer information and support.

Summary

House Bill 5520, titled 'An Act Concerning Homeowners And Motor Vehicle Insurance Policies', aims to enhance protections for policyholders, particularly focusing on individuals aged 55 and over. The bill mandates that insurers include a statement in their policies allowing these individuals to designate a third party to receive notices of cancellation or nonrenewal. This requirement is intended to ensure that senior citizens are adequately informed and supported in maintaining their insurance coverage, a crucial aspect for many in that demographic who may find navigating these matters challenging on their own.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 5520 appears to be positive, with supporters underscoring its importance in safeguarding the interests of senior citizens who may be vulnerable to abrupt changes in their insurance status. The bill reflects a growing awareness of the needs of older adults and aims to give them more control over their insurance matters. There seems to be broad agreement on the necessity of this change, highlighting a proactive approach to consumer protection in the insurance industry.

Contention

While the bill has been met with general support, it is essential to consider potential contentions regarding the implications of additional regulations placed on insurers. Critics may argue that introducing such requirements could lead to increased operational burdens for insurance companies, possibly resulting in higher premiums for all consumers. Thus, the balance between protecting senior citizens and ensuring that insurance providers can operate efficiently remains an important part of the ongoing discussion surrounding the bill.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB277

Criminal procedure: search of persons.

CA AB937

Plastic products: commercial agricultural mulch film: labeling: soil biodegradable.

CA AB2632

Segregated confinement.

CA AB1464

Housing preferences.

MI SB0975

Employment security: benefits; disqualification from benefits; modify. Amends sec. 29 of 1936 (Ex Sess) PA 1 (MCL 421.29).

CA AB2564

Individual Shared Responsibility Penalty: waiver: health care service plans.

CA SB479

Termination of tenancy: no-fault just cause: natural person.

CA SB1428

Reproductive health: mifepristone and other medication.