Connecticut 2016 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05611

Introduced
3/9/16  
Refer
3/9/16  
Report Pass
3/18/16  
Report Pass
3/18/16  
Refer
3/31/16  
Refer
3/31/16  
Report Pass
4/6/16  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Holding Of Public Hearings Prior To The Determination Of Polling Places By Municipal Legislative Bodies.

Impact

If enacted, HB 5611 would directly affect statutory provisions relating to polling places and voting districts. It would necessitate that municipalities hold public hearings following specific notice requirements prior to final decisions on polling places. This requirement is seen as a critical step in promoting civic involvement and ensuring that the choice of location is not done in isolation from the public's interests. Municipal clerks and registrars would be tasked with ensuring that the community is informed about upcoming hearings, thereby facilitating a more participatory electoral process.

Summary

House Bill 5611 aims to amend the process of determining polling places by requiring municipal legislative bodies to conduct public hearings before finalizing any proposed locations for polling places. By incorporating public engagement into the decision-making process, the bill seeks to enhance transparency and ensure that the community has a voice in where voting occurs. This legislative change responds to concerns about voter accessibility and the appropriateness of polling place locations in meeting the needs of local populations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 5611 appears to be largely supportive among advocates for electoral reform and community engagement. Proponents argue that public hearings will foster greater accountability among local governments and enhance voter confidence in the electoral process. This sentiment is reinforced by an increasing emphasis on transparency in government operations. However, there may be concerns about the feasibility of organizing such hearings effectively, but overall, the move is viewed positively as a means to empower citizens.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise regarding the potential burden this bill places on municipal legislatures, particularly in terms of logistics and timing. Critics might argue that requiring public hearings could delay the determination of polling locations, potentially leading to complications during election cycles. There could also be discussions about the adequacy of notice given for these hearings, as well as the ability of residents to effectively participate. Nonetheless, the overarching goal of HB 5611 is to enhance the democratic process by ensuring that local citizens have a say in where they vote.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

AR SB425

To Amend Various Provisions Of The Arkansas Code Concerning Enhanced Transportation; And To Declare An Emergency.

KY SB3

AN ACT relating to redistricting and declaring an emergency.

AR HB1238

To Amend Various Provisions Of The Arkansas Code Concerning Enhanced Transportation Funding Amounts; And To Declare An Emergency.

NH HB50

Apportioning state representative districts.

KY SB2

AN ACT relating to redistricting and declaring an emergency.

KY HB2

AN ACT relating to redistricting and declaring an emergency.

CA AB1719

Housing: Community College Faculty and Employee Housing Act of 2022.

MS HB1311

Seventh Circuit Court District; revise number of assistant district attorneys and criminal investigators.