Connecticut 2016 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00021

Introduced
2/4/16  
Introduced
2/4/16  
Refer
2/4/16  
Refer
2/4/16  
Report Pass
3/3/16  
Report Pass
3/3/16  
Refer
3/14/16  
Refer
3/14/16  
Report Pass
3/21/16  
Report Pass
3/21/16  
Refer
4/6/16  
Report Pass
4/11/16  
Report Pass
4/12/16  
Report Pass
4/12/16  
Engrossed
5/2/16  
Report Pass
5/2/16  
Chaptered
5/19/16  
Chaptered
5/19/16  
Enrolled
5/25/16  
Enrolled
5/25/16  
Passed
6/7/16  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Military Department's Nondiscrimination Laws.

Impact

This legislation significantly impacts how members of the military are treated under state law, ensuring that policies are in place to protect against discrimination. The updates made by SB00021 reflect a commitment to equality and inclusivity within the armed forces, potentially influencing recruitment and retention rates among marginalized communities. The law’s enactment manifests a broader trend towards enhancing civilian rights in military settings, while maintaining compliance with existing federal regulations.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 21, also known as Public Act No. 16-153, is legislation aimed at updating the nondiscrimination laws pertinent to the military department. The bill repeals previous statutory language and expands the protected categories of individuals, ensuring that no person is denied membership or discriminated against in the state's armed forces based on religion, national origin, color, race, sex, gender identity or expression, or sexual orientation. The objective of the bill is to align state law with federal nondiscrimination standards, promoting a more inclusive environment within the military framework.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00021 appears to be predominantly positive, reflecting a societal shift towards greater acceptance and support for LGBTQ+ rights within all sectors, including the military. Supporters of the bill, which likely include various advocacy groups, view the modernization of nondiscrimination laws as an important step towards equality. However, some conservative entities may oppose the bill on ideological grounds, potentially viewing the expansion of protected categories as unnecessary or as an infringement on traditional values.

Contention

One notable point of contention arises from the effort to balance non-discrimination with federal military regulations. While the bill's supporters advocate for broader protections, some critics may argue that the new legal definitions could complicate operational policies within military units. Additionally, discussions could emerge surrounding the practicality of enforcing these nondiscrimination provisions, particularly in light of different attitudes about military service in various sectors of the public.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT SB00004

An Act Concerning Victims Of Domestic Violence, The Unsolicited Transmission Of Intimate Images By Means Of An Electronic Communication Device And The Impermissible Use Of Nondisclosure Agreements In The Workplace.

CT HB05414

An Act Concerning Additional Legal Protections Under The Commission On Human Rights And Opportunities Statutes For Victims Of Sexual Assault, Trafficking In Persons And Stalking.

CT SB00327

An Act Establishing A Task Force To Study The Effects Of Hate Speech And Bullying On Children.

CT SB00235

An Act Concerning Military Leave Provisions Under The State Personnel Act.

CT SB00002

An Act Concerning Artificial Intelligence.

CT SB00006

An Act Concerning Housing.

CT SB00003

An Act Concerning Consumer Protection.

CT HB05288

An Act Aligning State Law With Federal Law Concerning Service Animals.

CT HB05422

An Act Concerning Hate And Bias Crimes.

CT SB00005

An Act Concerning School Resources.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.