Connecticut 2016 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00081

Introduced
2/10/16  
Refer
2/10/16  
Report Pass
2/24/16  
Refer
3/4/16  
Refer
3/4/16  
Report Pass
3/10/16  
Engrossed
4/29/16  
Report Pass
5/1/16  
Report Pass
5/1/16  
Chaptered
5/9/16  
Enrolled
5/16/16  
Enrolled
5/16/16  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Designation Of Certain Areas Of The Housatonic River As A Wild And Scenic River.

Impact

The bill designates the Housatonic River as a wild and scenic river, which allows for enhanced conservation measures and management strategies by the Northwest Hills Council of Governments. This designation not only places the river under protective status but also authorizes the administering agency to oversee its management according to the terms outlined in a memorandum of agreement. Consequently, it is expected to encourage responsible recreational activities and protect the river's natural resources, contributing to regional environmental health.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 81, also known as the Act Concerning the Designation of Certain Areas of the Housatonic River as a Wild and Scenic River, aims to formally designate a portion of the Housatonic River for the purposes of preservation under the federal Wild and Scenic Rivers Act. This designation seeks to ensure the protection and enhancement of the river's natural beauty and ecological values. By designating this area as a wild and scenic river, the bill aligns local and federal efforts to sustain the region's environmental quality and promote conservation initiatives.

Sentiment

The reception of SB00081 appears to be largely positive, reflecting a commitment to conservation and environmental protection from both local authorities and environmental advocacy groups. The designation is seen as a crucial step in protecting the river from potential degradation, thus garnering support from various stakeholders who emphasize the importance of preserving natural waterways for future generations. However, there may be concerns regarding the implications of increased regulations on local agricultural activities, although the bill clarifies that permitted agricultural practices will not be affected.

Contention

While the bill is primarily seen as a conservation measure, some concerns have been raised regarding its potential regulatory implications. The provision that allows agricultural activities to proceed without needing permits from the Army Corps of Engineers indicates an effort to balance conservation with existing land use practices. Nonetheless, the debate may center around the broader impacts of such designations on traditional land uses and property rights, as individuals and organizations weigh the benefits of preservation against their operational needs.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.