Connecticut Senate Bill SB00086

Connecticut 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/10/16
• Refer: 2/10/16

Caption

An Act Concerning The Fire Safety Code And One, Two And Three-family Dwellings.

Impact

If passed, SB00086 would significantly alter the landscape of fire safety regulation for smaller residential properties. Notably, it would allow for variations or exemptions from compliance where adhering to the regulations would impair the integrity of historic structures being used as private dwellings. This could encourage the preservation of significant local architectures while acknowledging that some existing regulations might not be practical for all residential settings. It will likely lead to a more tailored approach to fire safety that considers both public safety and the unique characteristics of historic homes.

Summary

SB00086 aims to amend the Fire Safety Code as it pertains to one, two, and three-family dwellings in the state. The bill proposes exemptions from certain Fire Safety Code regulations for small residential buildings, specifically those that could be impacted by compliance with the code. Its intent is to ease regulatory burdens on homeowners while still addressing safety concerns that arise in residential settings, especially for historic structures. The act seeks to strike a balance between maintaining fire safety standards and allowing for the preservation of historic homes that may not conform to stringent modern regulations.

Contention

Discussion around SB00086 may reveal points of contention regarding homeowner safety versus the need to preserve historic locations. Critics of the bill might argue that loosening safety regulations could expose residents in these family dwellings to undue risk, particularly in cases where adequate fire safety measures might not be enforced. Supporters would counter that personalized exemptions will not only respect historical architectures but also promote community upkeep and homeownership, potentially leading to a more vibrant and preserved living environment. This balance raises vital discussions about the priorities within state regulations and the implications for both public safety and heritage conservation.