11 | 23 | | |
---|
12 | 24 | | AN ACT CONCERNING RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION. |
---|
13 | 25 | | |
---|
14 | 26 | | Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives in General Assembly convened: |
---|
15 | 27 | | |
---|
16 | 28 | | Section 1. Section 10-5 of the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective July 1, 2016): |
---|
17 | 29 | | |
---|
18 | 30 | | (a) The Commissioner of Education shall, in accordance with this section, issue a state high school diploma to any person (1) who successfully completes an examination approved by the commissioner, or (2) who (A) is seventeen years of age and has been officially withdrawn from school in accordance with the provisions of section 10-184 or is eighteen years of age or older, and (B) presents to the commissioner evidence demonstrating educational qualifications which the commissioner deems equivalent to those required for graduation from a public high school. Application for such a diploma shall be made in the manner and form prescribed by the commissioner provided, at the time of application to take the examination described in subdivision (1) of this subsection, the applicant is seventeen years of age or older, has been officially withdrawn from school, in accordance with section 10-184, for at least six months and has been advised, in such manner as may be prescribed by the commissioner, of the other options for high school completion and other available educational programs. For good cause shown, the commissioner may allow a person who is sixteen years of age to apply to take the examination, provided the commissioner may not issue a state high school diploma to such person until the person has attained seventeen years of age. |
---|
19 | 31 | | |
---|
20 | 32 | | (b) Application to take or retake the examination described in subdivision (1) of subsection (a) of this section shall be accompanied by a money order or certified check in the nonrefundable amount of thirteen dollars. This amount shall include the fee for the state high school diploma. |
---|
21 | 33 | | |
---|
22 | 34 | | (c) No veteran, member of the armed forces, as defined in section 27-103, or any person under twenty-one years of age shall be required to pay the fees described in subsection (b) of this section. The commissioner may waive any fee described in subsection (b) upon the submission of evidence indicating an inability to pay. |
---|
23 | 35 | | |
---|
24 | 36 | | (d) The Commissioner of Education shall keep a correct account of all money received under the provisions of this section and shall deposit with the State Treasurer all such money received by said commissioner. Funds paid to a local or regional board of education under this section shall be deposited in the school activity fund established under section 10-237 and expended to defray the costs of such testing and related administration and information. |
---|
25 | 37 | | |
---|
26 | 38 | | (e) The commissioner shall establish criteria by which an "honors diploma" may be issued for exemplary performance on the examination. |
---|
27 | 39 | | |
---|
34 | | - | Sec. 3. Section 10-146c of the 2016 supplement to the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective July 1, 2016): |
---|
| 46 | + | Sec. 3. Subsection (e) of section 10-262j of the 2016 supplement to the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective from passage): |
---|
| 47 | + | |
---|
| 48 | + | (e) For the fiscal years ending June 30, 2016, and June 30, 2017, the provisions of this section shall not apply to any district that is (1) in the top ten per cent of school districts based on the [district performance] accountability index, as defined in section 10-262u, as amended by this act, and (2) classified as a category one district, as defined in section 10-223e, as amended by this act. |
---|
| 49 | + | |
---|
| 50 | + | Sec. 4. Subsections (a) and (b) of section 10-223e of the 2016 supplement to the general statutes are repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective from passage): |
---|
| 51 | + | |
---|
| 52 | + | (a) As used in this section: |
---|
| 53 | + | |
---|
| 54 | + | (1) "Accountability index" means the score resulting from multiple student, school or district-level measures, as weighted by the Department of Education, that (A) shall include the performance index score and high school graduation rates, and (B) may include, but need not be limited to, academic growth over time, attendance and chronic absenteeism, postsecondary education and career readiness, enrollment in and graduation from institutions of higher education and postsecondary education programs, civics and arts education and physical fitness. |
---|
| 55 | + | |
---|
| 56 | + | (2) "Performance index" means the score, as calculated by the Department of Education using the mastery test data of record, assigned to student subgroups, schools or districts. |
---|
| 57 | + | |
---|
| 58 | + | (3) "Mastery test data of record" has the same meaning as provided in section 10-262f. |
---|
| 59 | + | |
---|
| 60 | + | (4) "Category five schools" means schools with the lowest performance as indicated by factors set forth in the state-wide performance management and support plan, prepared pursuant to subsection (b) of this section, that may include, but are not limited to, the accountability index. |
---|
| 61 | + | |
---|
| 62 | + | (5) "Category four schools" means schools with the lowest performance other than category five schools as indicated by factors set forth in the state-wide performance management and support plan, prepared pursuant to subsection (b) of this section, that may include, but are not limited to, the accountability index. |
---|
| 63 | + | |
---|
| 64 | + | (6) "Category three schools" means schools with higher performance than category four and five schools, but lower performance than category one and two schools as indicated by factors set forth in the state-wide performance management and support plan, prepared pursuant to subsection (b) of this section, that may include, but are not limited to, the accountability index. |
---|
| 65 | + | |
---|
| 66 | + | (7) "Category two schools" means schools that have higher performance than category three, category four and category five schools, but lower performance than category one schools as indicated by factors set forth in the state-wide performance management and support plan, prepared pursuant to subsection (b) of this section, that may include, but are not limited to, the accountability index. |
---|
| 67 | + | |
---|
| 68 | + | (8) "Category one schools" means schools that have the highest performance as indicated by factors set forth in the state-wide performance management and support plan, prepared pursuant to subsection (b) of this section, that may include, but are not limited to, the accountability index. |
---|
| 69 | + | |
---|
| 70 | + | (9) "Category five districts" means districts with the lowest performance as indicated by factors set forth in the state-wide performance management and support plan, prepared pursuant to subsection (b) of this section, that may include, but are not limited to, the accountability index. |
---|
| 71 | + | |
---|
| 72 | + | (10) "Category four districts" means districts with the lowest performance other than category five districts as indicated by factors set forth in the state-wide performance management and support plan, prepared pursuant to subsection (b) of this section, that may include, but are not limited to, the accountability index. |
---|
| 73 | + | |
---|
| 74 | + | (11) "Category three districts" means districts with higher performance than category four and five districts, but lower performance than category one and two districts as indicated by factors set forth in the state-wide performance management and support plan, prepared pursuant to subsection (b) of this section, that may include, but are not limited to, the accountability index. |
---|
| 75 | + | |
---|
| 76 | + | (12) "Category two districts" means districts that have higher performance than category three, category four and category five districts, but lower performance than category one districts as indicated by factors set forth in the state-wide performance management and support plan, prepared pursuant to subsection (b) of this section, that may include, but are not limited to, the accountability index. |
---|
| 77 | + | |
---|
| 78 | + | (13) "Category one districts" means districts that have the highest performance as indicated by factors set forth in the state-wide performance management and support plan, prepared pursuant to subsection (b) of this section, that may include, but are not limited to, the accountability index. |
---|
| 79 | + | |
---|
| 80 | + | [(9)] (14) "Focus school" has the same meaning as "focus school" as described in the United States Department of Education's ESEA Flexibility policy document, updated June 7, 2012. |
---|
| 81 | + | |
---|
| 82 | + | (b) (1) For the school years commencing July 1, 2002, to July 1, 2011, inclusive, in conformance with the No Child Left Behind Act, P.L. 107-110, the Commissioner of Education shall prepare a state-wide education accountability plan, consistent with federal law and regulation. Such plan shall identify the schools and districts in need of improvement, require the development and implementation of improvement plans and utilize rewards and consequences. |
---|
| 83 | + | |
---|
| 84 | + | (2) For the school years commencing July 1, 2012, to July 1, 2014, inclusive, the Department of Education shall prepare a state-wide performance management and support plan, consistent with federal law and regulation. Such plan shall (A) identify districts in need of improvement, (B) classify schools as category one, two, three, four or five schools based on their school performance index and other factors, and (C) identify focus schools. |
---|
| 85 | + | |
---|
| 86 | + | (3) For the school year commencing July 1, 2015, and each school year thereafter, the Department of Education shall prepare a state-wide performance management and support plan, consistent with federal law and regulation. Such plan shall (A) identify districts in need of improvement, (B) classify schools as category one, two, three, four or five schools, [based on the accountability index,] (C) classify districts as category one, two, three, four or five districts, and [(C)] (D) identify focus schools. |
---|
| 87 | + | |
---|
| 88 | + | Sec. 5. Section 10-146c of the 2016 supplement to the general statutes is repealed and the following is substituted in lieu thereof (Effective July 1, 2016): |
---|
67 | 121 | | |
---|
68 | 122 | | (f) In addition to the amounts allocated in subsection (a), and subsections (c) to (e), inclusive, of this section, for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2006, the State Board of Education shall allocate two million thirty-nine thousand six hundred eighty-six dollars to the towns that rank one to three, inclusive, in population pursuant to subdivision (1) of said subsection (a), and for the fiscal [years] year ending June 30, 2007, [to June 30, 2015] and each fiscal year thereafter, the State Board of Education shall allocate two million six hundred ten thousand seven hundred ninety-eight dollars to the towns that rank one to three, inclusive, in population pursuant to subdivision (1) of said subsection (a). |
---|
69 | 123 | | |
---|
70 | 124 | | (g) In addition to the amounts allocated in subsection (a) and subsections (c) to (f), inclusive, of this section, for [the fiscal year ending June 30, 2012, the State Board of Education shall allocate three million two hundred sixteen thousand nine hundred eight dollars as follows: Each priority school district shall receive an allocation based on the ratio of the amount it is eligible to receive pursuant to subsection (a) and subsections (c) to (f), inclusive, of this section to the total amount all priority school districts are eligible to receive pursuant to said subsection (a) and said subsections (c) to (f), inclusive. For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2014, the State Board of Education shall allocate two million nine hundred twenty-five thousand four hundred eighty-one dollars as follows: Each priority school district shall receive an allocation based on the ratio of the amount it is eligible to receive pursuant to subsection (a) of this section and subsections (c) to (f), inclusive, of this section to the total amount all priority school districts are eligible to receive pursuant to subsection (a) of this section and subsections (c) to (f), inclusive, of this section. For] the fiscal year ending June 30, 2015, and each fiscal year thereafter, the State Board of Education shall allocate two million eight hundred eighty-two thousand three hundred sixty-eight dollars as follows: Each priority school district shall receive an allocation based on the ratio of the amount it is eligible to receive pursuant to subsection (a) of this section and subsections (c) to (f), inclusive, of this section to the total amount all priority school districts are eligible to receive pursuant to subsection (a) of this section and subsections (c) to (f), inclusive, of this section. For the fiscal year ending June 30, [2014] 2016, a priority school district may carry forward any unexpended funds allocated after May 1, [2014] 2016, pursuant to this subsection, into the fiscal year ending June 30, [2015] 2017. |
---|
71 | 125 | | |
---|
78 | | - | (4) In addition to the grants otherwise provided pursuant to this section, the Commissioner of Education may provide supplemental transportation grants to regional educational service centers for the purposes of transportation to interdistrict magnet schools. Any such grant shall be provided within available appropriations and after the commissioner has reviewed and approved the total interdistrict magnet school transportation budget for a regional educational service center, including all revenue and expenditure estimates. [For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010, in addition to the grants otherwise provided pursuant to this section, the Commissioner of Education, with the approval of the Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management, may provide supplemental transportation grants to the Hartford school district and the Capitol Region Education Council for the purposes of transportation of students who are not residents of Hartford to interdistrict magnet schools operated by the Capitol Region Education Council or the Hartford school district. For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2012, in addition to the grants otherwise provided pursuant to this section, the Commissioner of Education may provide supplemental transportation grants to regional educational service centers for the purposes of transportation to interdistrict magnet schools that assist the state in meeting the goals of the 2008 stipulation and order for Milo Sheff, et al. v. William A. O'Neill, et al. Any such grant shall be provided within available appropriations and upon a comprehensive financial review of all transportation activities as prescribed by the commissioner. The commissioner may require the regional educational service center to provide an independent financial review, by an auditor selected by the Commissioner of Education, the costs of which may be paid from funds that are part of the supplemental transportation grant. Any such grant shall be paid as follows: Up to fifty per cent of the grant on or before June 30, 2012, and the balance on or before September 1, 2012, upon completion of the comprehensive financial review. For the fiscal years ending June 30, 2013, to June 30, 2015, inclusive, in addition to the grants otherwise provided pursuant to this section, the Commissioner of Education may provide supplemental transportation to interdistrict magnet schools that assist the state in meeting the goals of the 2008 stipulation and order for Milo Sheff, et al. v. William A. O'Neill, et al., as extended, or the goals of the 2013 stipulation and order for Milo Sheff, et al. v. William A. O'Neill, et al. and for transportation provided by EASTCONN to interdistrict magnet schools. Any such grant shall be provided within available appropriations and upon a comprehensive financial review, by an auditor selected by the Commissioner of Education, the costs of such review may be paid from funds that are part of the supplemental transportation grant. Any such grant shall be paid as follows: For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013, up to fifty per cent of the grant on or before June 30, 2013, and the balance on or before September 1, 2013, upon completion of the comprehensive financial review; for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2014, up to fifty per cent of the grant on or before June 30, 2014, and the balance on or before September 1, 2014, upon completion of the comprehensive financial review; and for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2015, up to fifty per cent of the grant on or before June 30, 2015, and the balance on or before September 1, 2015, upon completion of the comprehensive financial review] For the fiscal years ending June 30, 2016, and June 30, 2017, in addition to the grants otherwise provided pursuant to this section, the Commissioner of Education may provide supplemental transportation to the Capitol Region Education Council for the purposes of transportation of students to interdistrict magnet schools that assist the state in meeting the goals of the 2008 stipulation and order for Milo Sheff, et al. v. William A. O'Neill, et al., as extended, or the goals of the 2013 stipulation and order for Milo Sheff, et al. v. William A. O'Neill, et al., as extended. Any such grant shall be provided within available appropriations and upon a comprehensive financial review, by an auditor selected by the Commissioner of Education, the costs of such review may be paid from funds that are appropriated for the supplemental transportation grant. Any such grant shall be paid in the subsequent fiscal year, upon completion of the comprehensive financial review. |
---|
| 132 | + | (4) In addition to the grants otherwise provided pursuant to this section, the Commissioner of Education may provide supplemental transportation grants to regional educational service centers for the purposes of transportation to interdistrict magnet schools. Any such grant shall be provided within available appropriations and after the commissioner has reviewed and approved the total interdistrict magnet school transportation budget for a regional educational service center, including all revenue and expenditure estimates. [For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2010, in addition to the grants otherwise provided pursuant to this section, the Commissioner of Education, with the approval of the Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management, may provide supplemental transportation grants to the Hartford school district and the Capitol Region Education Council for the purposes of transportation of students who are not residents of Hartford to interdistrict magnet schools operated by the Capitol Region Education Council or the Hartford school district. For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2012, in addition to the grants otherwise provided pursuant to this section, the Commissioner of Education may provide supplemental transportation grants to regional educational service centers for the purposes of transportation to interdistrict magnet schools that assist the state in meeting the goals of the 2008 stipulation and order for Milo Sheff, et al. v. William A. O'Neill, et al. Any such grant shall be provided within available appropriations and upon a comprehensive financial review of all transportation activities as prescribed by the commissioner. The commissioner may require the regional educational service center to provide an independent financial review, by an auditor selected by the Commissioner of Education, the costs of which may be paid from funds that are part of the supplemental transportation grant. Any such grant shall be paid as follows: Up to fifty per cent of the grant on or before June 30, 2012, and the balance on or before September 1, 2012, upon completion of the comprehensive financial review. For the fiscal years ending June 30, 2013, to June 30, 2015, inclusive, in addition to the grants otherwise provided pursuant to this section, the Commissioner of Education may provide supplemental transportation to interdistrict magnet schools that assist the state in meeting the goals of the 2008 stipulation and order for Milo Sheff, et al. v. William A. O'Neill, et al., as extended, or the goals of the 2013 stipulation and order for Milo Sheff, et al. v. William A. O'Neill, et al. and for transportation provided by EASTCONN to interdistrict magnet schools. Any such grant shall be provided within available appropriations and upon a comprehensive financial review, by an auditor selected by the Commissioner of Education, the costs of such review may be paid from funds that are part of the supplemental transportation grant. Any such grant shall be paid as follows: For the fiscal year ending June 30, 2013, up to fifty per cent of the grant on or before June 30, 2013, and the balance on or before September 1, 2013, upon completion of the comprehensive financial review; for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2014, up to fifty per cent of the grant on or before June 30, 2014, and the balance on or before September 1, 2014, upon completion of the comprehensive financial review; and for the fiscal year ending June 30, 2015, up to fifty per cent of the grant on or before June 30, 2015, and the balance on or before September 1, 2015, upon completion of the comprehensive financial review] For the fiscal years ending June 30, 2016, and June 30, 2017, in addition to the grants otherwise provided pursuant to this section, the Commissioner of Education may provide supplemental transportation to the Capitol Region Education Council for the purposes of transportation of students to interdistrict magnet schools that assist the state in meeting the goals of the 2008 stipulation and order for Milo Sheff, et al. v. William A. O'Neill, et al., as extended, or the goals of the 2013 stipulation and order for Milo Sheff, et al. v. William A. O'Neill, et al., as extended. Any such grant shall be provided within available appropriations and upon a comprehensive financial review, by an auditor selected by the Commissioner of Education, the costs of such review may be paid from funds that are part of the supplemental transportation grant. Any such grant shall be paid in the subsequent fiscal year, upon completion of the comprehensive financial review. |
---|
90 | | - | Sec. 3 July 1, 2016 10-146c |
---|
91 | | - | Sec. 4 July 1, 2016 10-145h |
---|
92 | | - | Sec. 5 July 1, 2016 10-262u(h) |
---|
93 | | - | Sec. 6 July 1, 2016 New section |
---|
94 | | - | Sec. 7 from passage New section |
---|
95 | | - | Sec. 8 from passage 10-266p(f) and (g) |
---|
96 | | - | Sec. 9 from passage 10-266p(i) |
---|
97 | | - | Sec. 10 from passage 10-264i(a)(4) |
---|
98 | | - | Sec. 11 July 1, 2016 10-264l(d)(2) |
---|
| 144 | + | Sec. 3 from passage 10-262j(e) |
---|
| 145 | + | Sec. 4 from passage 10-223e(a) and (b) |
---|
| 146 | + | Sec. 5 July 1, 2016 10-146c |
---|
| 147 | + | Sec. 6 July 1, 2016 10-145h |
---|
| 148 | + | Sec. 7 July 1, 2016 10-262u(h) |
---|
| 149 | + | Sec. 8 July 1, 2016 New section |
---|
| 150 | + | Sec. 9 from passage New section |
---|
| 151 | + | Sec. 10 from passage 10-266p(f) and (g) |
---|
| 152 | + | Sec. 11 from passage 10-266p(i) |
---|
| 153 | + | Sec. 12 from passage 10-264i(a)(4) |
---|
| 154 | + | Sec. 13 July 1, 2016 10-264l(d)(2) |
---|