Connecticut 2016 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00220

Introduced
2/22/16  
Refer
2/22/16  
Refer
2/22/16  
Report Pass
3/10/16  
Report Pass
3/10/16  
Refer
3/21/16  
Refer
3/21/16  
Report Pass
3/29/16  
Report Pass
3/29/16  
Engrossed
4/19/16  
Engrossed
4/19/16  
Report Pass
4/21/16  
Report Pass
4/21/16  
Chaptered
5/23/16  
Chaptered
5/23/16  
Enrolled
5/25/16  
Passed
6/6/16  

Caption

An Act Concerning Unemployment Compensation Appeals And Hearings, Employee Pay Periods And Minor And Technical Revisions To The General Statutes Relating To The Labor Department.

Impact

The implications of SB00220 are significant as they are expected to enhance transparency in the unemployment benefits process. For instance, it mandates that employers be notified of benefit allocations, improving their capacity to understand and respond to charges against their accounts. This greater communication may help decrease disputes related to benefit entitlements and foster a more cooperative approach between employers and the Labor Department. Additionally, the bill standardizes employee pay periods, thereby aligning with contemporary employment practices and potentially increasing compliance with labor law guidelines.

Summary

SB00220, titled 'An Act Concerning Unemployment Compensation Appeals And Hearings, Employee Pay Periods And Minor And Technical Revisions To The General Statutes Relating To The Labor Department,' aims to update and improve the existing frameworks surrounding unemployment compensation in the state. The bill addresses the appeal process for unemployment benefits, the notification to employers about benefit allocations, and the requirements around employee pay periods. These technical revisions are intended to modernize the state’s labor laws and ensure they are responsive to current workplace needs and legal standards.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00220 appears largely supportive within legislative discussions, especially from members focused on modernizing labor laws to benefit both employees and employers. However, there is acknowledgment of the complexity of implementing these changes and ensuring that all stakeholders are adequately informed and engaged. Some concerns may arise about how effectively the revisions can be operationalized within existing frameworks and whether they adequately address the needs of all parties involved in unemployment compensation claims.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential for confusion among both employers and employees regarding the changes to the appeals process and notification protocols. While the intention is to facilitate better understanding and responsiveness, there is concern that these revisions could inadvertently create challenges in complying with new regulations. Additionally, the bill includes provisions that aim to prevent fraud and abuse within the unemployment compensation system, raising questions about the balance between enhanced oversight and fair treatment of claimants.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ A3830

Concerns timely payment of UI benefits.

NJ S2357

Concerns timely payment of UI benefits.

CT HB06633

An Act Restructuring Unemployment Insurance Benefits And Improving Fund Solvency.

NJ S2949

Revises unemployment compensation law.

NJ A4047

Revises unemployment compensation law.

NJ A3460

Requires sharing of incarceration information between government agencies; prohibits certain benefits program payments to incarcerated individuals.

CT SB00210

An Act Concerning Technical And Other Changes To The Labor Department Statutes.

IN SB0371

Workforce matters.