Connecticut 2016 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00330

Introduced
2/26/16  
Refer
2/26/16  
Report Pass
3/18/16  
Refer
3/29/16  
Report Pass
4/5/16  
Engrossed
4/13/16  
Engrossed
4/13/16  
Report Pass
4/14/16  
Report Pass
4/14/16  
Chaptered
4/29/16  
Enrolled
5/2/16  
Enrolled
5/2/16  
Passed
5/5/16  

Caption

An Act Concerning Demolition Permits.

Impact

The bill amends existing laws significantly by establishing clearer guidelines for granting demolition permits. It also allows local municipalities the authority to enforce a waiting period of up to 180 days before issuing such permits, with certain exceptions for transportation projects. This aspect is intended to ensure a more thorough review process before demolition activities commence, which, in turn, can lead to increased public safety and community planning considerations. The inclusion of insurance requirements serves to protect both the public and local government liability.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 330 is an act focused on the regulation of demolition permits within the state. The bill mandates that individuals or companies intending to demolish buildings must secure a demolition permit from the respective municipal building official. In order to obtain such a permit, applicants are required to provide written documentation that includes proof of financial responsibility through insurance, confirmation of severed utility connections, licensing qualifications, and a declaration of liability protection for the municipality and its agents against potential claims during demolition operations.

Sentiment

The general sentiment around SB00330 appears to be supportive among those advocating for stricter regulations regarding demolition practices and community safety. Proponents argue that the bill is a necessary step for ensuring that demolition projects are conducted safely and responsibly. However, concerns were raised about the potential bureaucratic delays caused by the mandatory waiting period, which some critics view as an impediment to timely construction and community development efforts.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding the bill include the provisions regarding the waiting period for issuing permits. Some local governments might welcome this additional oversight as a means of protecting public interests, while opponents argue that it could lead to unnecessary delays in urgent demolition cases. Additionally, the requirement for insurance coverage may lead to increased costs for demolition contractors, which could have implications for smaller operators in the industry, making compliance more challenging.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.