Connecticut Senate Bill SB00365

Connecticut 2016 Regular Session

• Introduced: 3/2/16
• Refer: 3/2/16
• Report Pass: 3/30/16
• Refer: 4/8/16
• Report Pass: 4/14/16
• Engrossed: 4/28/16
• Report Pass: 4/30/16
• Chaptered: 5/19/16
• Enrolled: 5/25/16
• Passed: 6/9/16

Caption

An Act Concerning Child Endangerment While Driving While Under The Influence.

Impact

The enactment of SB00365 alters existing DUI laws by introducing enhanced penalties for offenders. For a first violation, offenders face fines ranging from $500 to $2000, a possible one-year imprisonment term, and mandatory attendance in alcohol or drug abuse assessment and treatment programs. Repeated violations lead to escalated fines and imprisonment durations, highlighting the state's commitment to preventing child endangerment in the context of DUI offenses. Additionally, those convicted will have their driver’s licenses suspended and be required to install ignition interlock devices on their vehicles.

Summary

SB00365, also known as 'An Act Concerning Child Endangerment While Driving While Under The Influence,' is a legislative measure aimed at enhancing public safety by imposing stricter penalties for individuals who operate vehicles under the influence of alcohol or drugs while transporting children. The bill designates a child under eighteen years of age as a passenger and outlines specific blood alcohol content thresholds that trigger penalties. The legislation takes effect on October 1, 2016.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00365 appears largely supportive, with an emphasis on protecting vulnerable populations—namely children. Advocates assert that tougher penalties are vital for deterring individuals from driving under the influence when minors are present. Nonetheless, there may be concerns among some regarding the implications of these penalties on families and the potential for disproportionate impacts on low-income individuals who may rely on their vehicles for transportation.

Contention

The bill's discussions revealed points of contention, primarily concerning the balance between imposing strict criminal penalties and ensuring that individuals receive appropriate treatment for substance abuse issues. Opponents of the bill may argue that punitive measures should be supported by treatment options to address underlying problems rather than just creating barriers for offenders. The law's practical application, particularly in how it might affect family transportation logistics following a DUI conviction, also raises questions about its fairness and effectiveness.