Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05126

Introduced
1/4/17  
Introduced
1/4/17  
Refer
1/4/17  

Caption

An Act Setting Limits On Nutritional Assistance For Certain Able-bodied Adults.

Impact

The bill's potential impact on state laws centers around the administration of nutritional assistance benefits. By enforcing work requirements for able-bodied adults, the bill aims to incentivize employment and reduce the number of individuals receiving benefits for prolonged periods without contributing to the workforce. This could lead to significant changes in how the state approaches food security and welfare programs, potentially reducing dependency on state assistance for some groups while also creating avenues for job training and employment opportunities.

Summary

House Bill 05126 proposes to amend existing laws related to nutritional assistance programs by instituting limits on benefits for able-bodied adults without dependents. The bill seeks to ensure that individuals who are capable of working or volunteering do not rely indefinitely on supplemental nutrition assistance. Specifically, it establishes a framework whereby these individuals can only receive benefits for a maximum of three months unless they fulfill certain criteria such as working a minimum of twenty hours per week, participating in a federally approved work training program, or meeting federal workfare requirements. This measure reflects broader legislative concerns around welfare dependency and encourages active participation in the workforce.

Contention

While proponents of HB 05126 argue that the bill promotes self-sufficiency and encourages individuals to seek employment, detractors raise concerns about the potential consequences for vulnerable populations. Critics point out that the stringent requirements could disproportionately affect those who are unable to find work or secure adequate hours due to various economic factors. Additionally, there is apprehension that the bill might exacerbate food insecurity among the affected individuals, who may struggle to meet the new conditions set forth in the legislation. This point of contention highlights the ongoing debate between encouraging personal responsibility and ensuring a safety net for those in need.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.