Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05221

Introduced
1/6/17  
Introduced
1/6/17  
Refer
1/6/17  

Caption

An Act Concerning Voting By The General Assembly On Collective Bargaining Agreements And Agreements And Stipulations In Connection With A Lawsuit.

Impact

The implications of HB 05221 are significant as it modifies existing statutes, specifically sections 5-278 and 3-125a of the general statutes. By requiring a vote from both chambers on these agreements, the bill seeks to fortify legislative command over essential state financial obligations and legal commitments. Such a change would potentially alter how the state negotiates with its employee unions, as it introduces an additional step in the approval process, making it more challenging to finalize agreements without legislative consent.

Summary

House Bill 05221 aims to enhance the legislative oversight of collective bargaining agreements involving state employee organizations, as well as stipulations connected to lawsuits. Specifically, the bill mandates that each chamber of the General Assembly must vote in order to approve or reject all collective bargaining agreements. This measure intends to ensure greater transparency and accountability in the state's negotiation processes with employee unions and in legal matters that involve the state.

Conclusion

Ultimately, HB 05221 serves as a pivotal piece of legislation that could reshape the landscape of collective bargaining for state employees and legal agreements. As the bill progresses, it promises to elicit robust discussions on the balance between government control and the rights of employee organizations and the implications for public service labor relations.

Contention

There are points of contention surrounding HB 05221. Proponents argue that the bill is crucial for ensuring that taxpayers are represented in negotiations and that such agreements do not occur in secrecy or without proper checks. Critics, however, may contend that this additional legislative layer could complicate and delay essential negotiations, particularly if political divisions affect voting patterns within the chambers. They may argue this could hinder the state's ability to respond efficiently to employee needs and legal disputes.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.