Connecticut House Bill HB05502

Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/12/17
• Refer: 1/12/17
• Refer: 1/27/17
• Report Pass: 3/1/17
• Refer: 3/9/17
• Report Pass: 3/13/17

Caption

An Act Requiring The Department Of Energy And Environmental Protection To Notify Commercial Project Applicants Of Deficiencies Within Ninety Days.

Impact

The primary impact of HB 5502 is on the statutory framework that governs the permitting process for commercial projects under the purview of DEEP. By ensuring that applicants receive timely feedback on deficiencies, the bill is intended to streamline the permitting process and potentially enhance the overall efficiency of the state's environmental review operations. This legislative change is expected to not only benefit applicants by providing clearer guidelines but also aid DEEP in managing its workload more effectively.

Summary

House Bill 5502 mandates that the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection (DEEP) must notify commercial project applicants of any deficiencies in their permit applications within ninety days of receipt. The bill aims to create a more efficient review process for commercial projects by ensuring that applicants are made aware of any issues in a timely manner, thus allowing them a clearer path to rectify these deficiencies and proceed with their applications. This approach is viewed as a way to reduce delays in project approval processes and to facilitate better compliance with state regulations in environmental matters.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 5502 appears to be positive, particularly among business and commercial interests who see it as a step forward in reducing bureaucratic delays. Supporters argue that by mandating a clear timeline for identifying application deficiencies, it encourages a more proactive and engaged approach from both the department and the applicants. However, there may be some concern among environmental advocates about ensuring that the expedited process does not compromise thorough assessments of environmental impacts.

Contention

While there is support for HB 5502, notable points of contention may arise regarding how the bill balances efficiency with environmental diligence. Some legislators and advocacy groups may express anxiety that rapid notification could lead DEEP to prioritize speed over comprehensive examinations of applications, potentially leading to insufficient environmental protections. The careful implementation of this bill will be crucial to address these concerns and to ensure that it achieves its objectives without undermining environmental oversight.