Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB05756

Introduced
1/17/17  
Refer
1/17/17  
Refer
3/17/17  
Refer
3/17/17  
Report Pass
3/22/17  
Report Pass
3/22/17  
Refer
3/29/17  
Refer
3/29/17  
Report Pass
4/4/17  
Report Pass
4/4/17  
Engrossed
5/2/17  
Engrossed
5/2/17  
Report Pass
5/4/17  

Caption

An Act Concerning The State Dental Commission.

Impact

The modifications set forth in HB 5756 are expected to positively influence state dental regulations by broadening the expertise represented on the Commission. By including more public members, the bill aims to capture a wider range of community perspectives, which may lead to more balanced decision-making that prioritizes patient welfare. This bill also empowers the Commissioner of Public Health to issue essential regulations to ensure proper dental care, relying on established ethical and health standards, thereby potentially raising the quality of dental services across the state.

Summary

House Bill 5756, titled 'An Act Concerning the State Dental Commission', proposes an amendment to the structure and composition of the State Dental Commission in Connecticut. The bill seeks to increase the commission's membership from nine to ten members, ensuring it includes six practicing dentists, one dental hygienist, and three public members. This change is intended to enhance representation and improve oversight regarding dental practices and public health standards. The overall aim is to ensure that the dental industry in Connecticut is effectively regulated to foster public trust and safety in dental care.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 5756 appears largely supportive, with proponents viewing it as a proactive measure to improve dental care regulation. There is recognition of the need for stronger oversight in healthcare practices, particularly in dentistry, where public health can be at risk. However, as with many regulatory changes, there may be concerns raised about the practicality of implementing the new structure and ensuring that all member voices are adequately represented in decision-making processes.

Contention

While there have not been significant points of contention that can be identified in the initial discussions surrounding this bill, the increase in public representation may provoke discussions regarding the qualifications and appropriateness of public members in influencing dental regulations. Stakeholders in the dental profession might raise concerns about the impact of such changes on professional autonomy and the potential for increased bureaucratic oversight over their practices. Ultimately, the extent of these concerns would likely depend on how the bill is implemented and the effectiveness of the newly structured commission.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.