Connecticut House Bill HB06185

Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/20/17
• Refer: 1/20/17

Caption

An Act Establishing An Innovation Incentive Program For Nonprofit Providers Of Human Services.

Impact

The implications of HB 06185 on state laws are significant as it amends Title 4 of the general statutes to permit nonprofit providers to keep financial savings achieved through efficient service delivery. This change substantiates the notion that efficiency in human services not only benefits the providers but also allows for reinvestment into improving service quality, ultimately benefiting the communities they serve. Supporters of the bill view this approach as a progressive step towards strengthening the nonprofit sector's ability to innovate and deliver better outcomes for individuals who rely on these services.

Summary

House Bill 06185 aims to establish an Innovation Incentive Program for nonprofit providers of human services. The bill's primary intent is to encourage innovation and efficiency in the delivery of these services by allowing human services providers to retain savings at the end of their contract terms. If a state agency determines that the provider has complied with the necessary contractual and service delivery requirements, these retained savings can be reinvested back into the service delivery process. This mechanism is designed to motivate nonprofit entities to optimize their service offerings while ensuring compliance with state standards.

Contention

While the bill has garnered support for its innovative approach, there may be points of contention regarding oversight and accountability. Critics might argue that granting providers the ability to retain savings could potentially lead to inefficiencies or a lack of oversight if not monitored effectively. Ensuring that there are adequate checks in place to prevent misuse of funds or dilution of service quality will be crucial in the implementation of this program. The balance between incentivizing efficiency and maintaining state oversight represents a central debate surrounding the bill.