Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06209

Introduced
1/20/17  
Introduced
1/20/17  
Refer
1/20/17  
Refer
1/20/17  
Refer
2/16/17  

Caption

An Act Concerning Union Stewards And Compensation From The State.

Impact

If enacted, HB 6209 could lead to a transformation in labor relations within state employments by limiting the financial support that unions can receive from state resources for steward activities. This change could compel employee organizations to seek alternative methods for funding union-related work or negotiate adjustments in their operational strategies. With this legislative shift, the state may also face implications related to the ease of employee organization and the overall landscape of collective bargaining.

Summary

House Bill 6209 proposes significant amendments to existing statutory provisions concerning union stewards and their compensation. The primary goal of the bill is to prohibit the allocation of state funds for compensating union stewards for work conducted during state time. This legislative move is framed within a broader context of reevaluating labor dynamics and state expenditures linked to union activities. The bill seeks to delineate more clearly the boundary between state responsibilities and union operations, particularly regarding financial resources.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 6209 appears to be mixed. Supporters view the bill favorably, arguing that it eliminates undue financial support for union activities conducted on state time, thus safeguarding public resources. However, critics express concerns that the bill undermines the ability of employee organizations to represent their members effectively. The debate encapsulates lingering tensions in labor politics, pitting fiscal accountability against union advocacy and employee representation.

Contention

A notable point of contention resides in the balance between state budgetary constraints and labor rights. Advocates for the bill prioritize the management of public funds, suggesting that taxpayers should not bear the cost of union representatives conducting union business during work hours. Conversely, opponents warn that restricting compensation for union stewards may weaken unions' bargaining power, potentially harming employees’ ability to negotiate fair working conditions. The discussion around this bill reflects a deeper ideological divide regarding the role of unions in the public sector.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CT HB05090

An Act Concerning Funding For Training Law Enforcement Officers.

CT HB05352

An Act Concerning Minor Revisions To The Tire Stewardship Program.

CT HB05353

An Act Concerning The Gas Cylinder Stewardship Program.

CT HB05042

An Act Concerning The Sales Price Threshold Of Motor Vehicles Subject To A Higher Sales And Use Taxes Rate.

CT HB05062

An Act Concerning Funding Of The Special Education Excess Cost Grant.

CT HB05041

An Act Exempting Certain Articles Of Children's Clothing From The Sales And Use Taxes.

CT HB05043

An Act Reducing Fees For Small Business Filings With The Secretary Of The State.

CT SB00222

An Act Concerning Changes To The Paid Family And Medical Leave Statutes.

CT HB05044

An Act Establishing A Child Tax Credit Against The Personal Income Tax.

CT SB00223

An Act Concerning Workers' Compensation.

Similar Bills

CA SB999

Mobilehome park residencies: rent control: exemption: COVID-19.

CA AB1345

Residential Exclusive Listing Agreements Act.

CA AB1380

Premarital agreements: enforcement.

CA AB2517

Water: irrigation districts: long-term maintenance agreements.

WV SB453

Establishing uniform requirements for restrictive employment agreements

CA AB1023

Ronald Reagan Day: state holiday.

CA AB1972

Income share agreements: postsecondary training: gross income exclusion.

TX HB1985

Relating to debt cancellation agreements offered in connection with certain retail installment contracts and leases for vehicles.