Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06221

Introduced
1/20/17  
Refer
1/20/17  
Refer
3/21/17  
Report Pass
3/24/17  
Refer
4/6/17  
Refer
4/6/17  
Report Pass
4/12/17  
Report Pass
4/12/17  
Engrossed
5/30/17  
Report Pass
5/31/17  
Chaptered
6/19/17  
Chaptered
6/19/17  
Enrolled
6/23/17  
Enrolled
6/23/17  
Passed
7/7/17  

Caption

An Act Concerning Recovery Of Payments From Collateral Sources By A Municipality With A Self-insured Health Plan.

Impact

With the implementation of HB 6221, municipalities can enhance their ability to recuperate healthcare expenses related to employee injuries caused by third parties. This provision is significant as it allows local governments to support their financial health by recovering funds that would otherwise be borne solely by taxpayers. However, the bill also establishes various limitations, such as no lien for amounts under $15,000 and specific requirements for notifying employees about the lien. These stipulations aim to balance the interests of municipalities with the rights of employees, thereby fostering a more equitable recovery system.

Summary

House Bill 6221 addresses the issue of recovering payments made by municipalities with self-insured health plans when their employees incur medical expenses due to the negligence or recklessness of third parties. The bill establishes that such municipalities are entitled to a lien on any settlement or judgment recovered from a tortfeasor, which reflects payments made for economic losses related to medical, hospital, and prescription expenses. This legal framework aims to clarify the rights and processes involved in recovery, while limiting the conditions under which lien claims arise and ensuring transparency for affected employees.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 6221 appears generally positive among local government representatives and municipal finance advocates, who see this as a necessary step in managing healthcare costs and promoting fiscal accountability. However, concerns have been raised by employee advocates who fear that the recovery of liens may limit employees’ rights and complicate access to benefits. The discussions indicate a nuanced perspective, where the benefits to municipalities must be carefully weighed against the potential consequences for employees involved in tort claims.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the provisions that restrict liens for certain cases and the overall impact of the bill on employees' access to appropriate health care coverages. Some legislators argue that the bill could inadvertently disadvantage employees recovering from workplace injuries, particularly if they face challenges related to the claims process and lien notifications. Further, debates surfaced regarding how municipalities should communicate lien information to ensure that employees are fully aware of their rights and obligations regarding reimbursements.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB33

2017 northern California wildfires.

HI HB881

Relating To Public Utilities.

HI HB2265

Relating To Public Utilities.

HI SB2922

Relating To Public Utilities.

CA SB1334

Substance use disorder treatment: licensing.

CA AB1513

Electrical corporations: financing orders: wildfire mitigation expenses.

CA AB3263

Electrical corporations: financing orders.

CA AB745

Electricity: clean energy transmission projects: utility infrastructure undergrounding: financing.