Connecticut House Bill HB06710

Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/24/17
• Refer: 1/24/17

Caption

An Act Concerning The Nondisclosure Of The Residential Addresses And Telephone Numbers Of Police Officers And Correction Officers On Municipal Land Records.

Impact

If enacted, HB 6710 would significantly alter the existing regulations pertaining to public access to municipal land records by classifying residential information of police and correction officers as non-disclosable. This change aligns with broader trends in legislation aimed at protecting law enforcement personnel, as it addresses privacy concerns that have been increasingly pronounced in the social and political discourse surrounding law enforcement. By preventing local municipalities from sharing this sensitive information, the bill aims to enhance the security of officers and their families.

Summary

House Bill 6710 seeks to enhance the privacy protections for police officers and correction officers by amending the existing statute to prohibit the disclosure of their residential addresses and telephone numbers on municipal land records. This initiative is particularly aimed at safeguarding the personal information of these public servants amid increasing concerns for their safety and privacy due to potential threats from the public or criminal elements. The bill, introduced by Representative Pavalock-D'Amato, reflects an ongoing effort to address the vulnerabilities faced by those who serve in law enforcement.

Contention

The discussion around HB 6710 may center on the balance between public access to information and the privacy rights of individuals employed in sensitive positions such as law enforcement. Proponents argue that the protection of officers' private information is critical in safeguarding not only their personal security but also that of their families. However, there could be contention from transparency advocates who might argue that such measures could hinder public oversight of law enforcement practices. Hence, while the intention is to fortify the privacy of officers, the concerns around accountability must also be considered.