Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06747

Introduced
1/25/17  
Refer
1/25/17  

Caption

An Act Prohibiting State Subsidies, Grants And Bond-funded Financial Assistance To Certain Publicly Traded Companies.

Impact

If enacted, HB 06747 would amend existing state laws regarding how public financial assistance is allocated, specifically targeting large publicly traded corporations. As a result, this may lead to considerable shifts in corporate recruitment practices and compensation strategies in Connecticut. Companies may need to re-evaluate their wage structures to become eligible for state funding, potentially resulting in increased wages for employees in an effort to comply with the bill's stipulations. On a broader scale, this legislation could set a precedent for other states to reconsider how they subsidize large corporations and their responsibility towards maintaining equitable wage practices.

Summary

House Bill 06747 aims to prohibit state subsidies, grants, and bond-funded financial assistance to publicly traded companies that have a pay disparity where their highest-paid employee earns more than 100 times the median wage of a worker in Connecticut. This legislation seeks to directly address income inequality within the state and is intended to incentivize higher median wages for workers. The bill suggests that the financial assistance from the state should be reserved for those companies that maintain a fair wage structure, thereby promoting equitable income distribution among employees.

Contention

The legislation has sparked a debate over its potential effects on businesses and the state's economy. Proponents of HB 06747 argue that it promotes social equity and discourages salary disparity among executives and their employees, fostering a more just working environment. Opponents, however, raise concerns that such regulations could deter investment in Connecticut, as publicly traded companies may look to relocate to more business-friendly states where they wouldn't be restricted by similar wage criteria. Critics also argue that the bill may inadvertently penalize companies that have higher operational costs due to market realities, thereby impacting their growth and job creation abilities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.