Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB06956

Introduced
1/25/17  
Introduced
1/25/17  
Refer
1/25/17  
Refer
3/16/17  
Refer
3/16/17  
Report Pass
3/17/17  
Report Pass
3/17/17  
Refer
3/30/17  
Refer
3/30/17  
Report Pass
4/5/17  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Use Of Child Restraint Systems.

Impact

This legislation is expected to impact state traffic laws significantly, reinforcing the need for parents and guardians to adhere to stringent safety standards when transporting children in vehicles. By specifying requirements for child restraint systems based on age and weight categories, the bill seeks to minimize the risk of injury in accidents, thereby promoting child safety on the state’s highways. It reflects a broader movement toward increased accountability in child protection within transportation.

Summary

House Bill 06956 aims to amend existing laws concerning the use of child restraint systems in vehicles, ensuring stricter compliance to enhance child safety during transportation. Specifically, the bill outlines clear requirements for securing children in a motor vehicle based on their age and weight, introducing distinctions that affect how children under eight years old should be restrained in different types of car seats.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 06956 appears largely supportive, particularly among child safety advocates and organizations emphasizing the necessity of proper child restraint systems. However, there may be some contention regarding the enforcement of such regulations and the potential financial burden imposed on families required to invest in appropriate safety equipment. Lawmakers generally recognize the significance of this legislation in safeguarding young passengers, leading to a positive outlook from various stakeholders.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns over the financial implications for families who may need to invest in new child restraint systems to comply with the updated regulations as well as the enforcement mechanisms for these laws. Critics may argue that the expansion of safety requirements might impose undue burdens on parents, while supporters counter that the benefits of preventing injuries and fatalities in children far outweigh such considerations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB878

Juveniles: restraints.

CA AB1798

Schoolbuses: passenger restraint systems.

CA AB692

Schoolbuses: passenger restraint systems.

CA AB435

Vehicles: child passenger restraints.

CA AB1196

Peace officers: use of force.

CA AB2557

Disabled placards.

CA AB490

Law enforcement agency policies: arrests: positional asphyxia.

CT SB01146

An Act Concerning Child Restraint Systems For Children Transported In Motor Vehicles.