Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB07221

Introduced
3/1/17  
Refer
3/1/17  
Report Pass
3/24/17  
Report Pass
3/24/17  
Refer
3/31/17  
Refer
3/31/17  
Report Pass
4/6/17  
Refer
4/11/17  
Refer
4/11/17  
Report Pass
4/13/17  
Report Pass
4/13/17  
Engrossed
5/24/17  
Engrossed
5/24/17  
Report Pass
5/26/17  
Chaptered
6/22/17  
Enrolled
6/27/17  
Enrolled
6/27/17  
Passed
7/5/17  

Caption

An Act Concerning Access To Water Planning Information.

Impact

The bill significantly impacts the management of water resources and their planning in the state. By defining what constitutes confidential records, including vulnerability assessments and emergency plans, it seeks to enhance the protection of public health and safety while maintaining necessary regulatory oversight. The legislation obliges water companies to submit comprehensive water supply plans that forecast water demand and outline contingency procedures for emergencies. Importantly, it provides a structured approach for the disclosure of such plans, aiming to streamline communication between water companies and public health authorities.

Summary

House Bill 07221, titled 'An Act Concerning Access To Water Planning Information', was introduced with the intent of improving access to crucial water planning records, while addressing safety concerns. This bill amends existing laws to clarify what records are exempt from disclosure under the Freedom of Information Act, particularly focusing on those that may pose a safety risk if disclosed. It emphasizes the importance of balancing public access to information and the need to protect sensitive security documents related to water supplies and facilities.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment surrounding HB 07221 has been largely supportive among those who prioritize public health and safety. Advocates argue that the bill appropriately determines the fine line between public access to information and the protection of sensitive data that could be detrimental if leaked. However, there have been voices of caution from those concerned about potential overreach in the restriction of public access to records. Opponents fear that expanding the scope of confidentiality might impede transparency and limit community engagement in critical water management issues.

Contention

One notable point of contention raised during discussions of the bill is the potential for misuse of the confidentiality provisions. Critics stress that while protecting sensitive information is vital, the expansive definition of what constitutes a safety risk might be leveraged to withhold essential data from the public. The robustness of the emergency contingency plans and the mechanisms for ensuring their effectiveness were also scrutinized, emphasizing the need for accountability in water management practices. Thus, balancing safety with transparency remains a central theme of the legislative discourse surrounding HB 07221.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

TX HB3306

Relating to the disclosure of information concerning the corporate governance structure of certain insurers and related entities; providing an administrative penalty.

TX SB2122

Relating to the disclosure of information concerning the corporate governance structure of certain insurers and related entities; providing an administrative penalty.

MN HF1430

Well disclosure certificates modified, fee established, and money appropriated.

MN SF1769

Requirements modification for well disclosures certificates

MN SF4980

Well disclosure certificates requirements modifications; appropriating money

MN HF4825

Well disclosure certificate requirements modified, fee established, and money appropriated.

CA AB1323

Public utilities: information: confidentiality.

CA SB33

Commercial financing: disclosures.