Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB07252

Introduced
3/9/17  
Introduced
3/9/17  
Refer
3/9/17  
Refer
3/9/17  
Report Pass
3/24/17  
Report Pass
3/24/17  
Refer
4/5/17  
Report Pass
4/11/17  
Refer
5/10/17  

Caption

An Act Establishing An Adjudication Process For Special Education And Requiring Boards Of Education To Develop A Policy Permitting Parents To Observe Their Child At School.

Impact

If enacted, this bill significantly strengthens the rights of parents and guardians of children requiring special education, enabling them to request hearings and challenge decisions made by local boards of education. The bill also requires timely resolutions, stipulating that decisions on educational placements be made within a specified timeframe, thus promoting accountability among educational institutions. The establishment of an independent adjudicator for disputes is aimed at ensuring a fair review process that considers the interests of both parties involved. This change seeks to provide immediate recourse for parents to safeguard their children's educational needs and rights.

Summary

House Bill 07252 establishes an adjudication process specifically for special education disputes and mandates that boards of education create a policy that allows parents to observe their child in a classroom setting. The bill aims to enhance transparency and facilitate smoother communication between parents and educational authorities when disputes arise regarding the identification, evaluation, or educational placement of children requiring special education services. Importantly, it complements existing laws under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA).

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding HB 07252 appears to be predominantly supportive among educational advocates and families of children with disabilities, as it aims to empower parents and enhance educational oversight. However, there could be concerns from education professionals regarding the additional administrative responsibilities and potential for increased conflict due to the formalized hearing process. Overall, those in favor view the bill as necessary to ensure access to appropriate educational services and to better involve parents in their children's education.

Contention

One area of contention may arise from the implications of how the adjudication process could be implemented. While the bill provides a structured means to resolve disputes, it may also introduce complexities and delays if disputes proliferate, leading to concerns about resource allocation within school boards. There might also be resistance from some education stakeholders who fear that the adjudication framework could lead to an adversarial relationship between parents and schools, rather than a collaborative approach to the educational planning for special needs students.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

NJ A3853

Makes various changes in the charter school program in regard to student enrollment procedures, charter revocation, and monitoring of charter schools.

NJ A891

Makes various changes in the charter school program in regard to student enrollment procedures, charter revocation, and monitoring of charter schools.

NJ S2608

Makes various changes in the charter school program in regard to student enrollment procedures, charter revocation, and monitoring of charter schools.

NJ S2163

Makes various changes in the charter school program in regard to student enrollment procedures, charter revocation, and monitoring of charter schools.

CT HB05552

An Act Concerning Special Education.

NJ S1717

Allows parent or guardian to exclude student from administration of State assessment.

CT HB06883

An Act Concerning Students With Developmental Disabilities.

CT SB01105

An Act Concerning The Dissolution Process Of Regional School Districts.