Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

Connecticut House Bill HB07315

Introduced
3/29/17  
Introduced
3/29/17  
Refer
3/29/17  
Report Pass
4/27/17  
Report Pass
4/27/17  
Refer
5/4/17  

Caption

An Act Concerning The Purchase Of A Replacement Motor Vehicle In A Buyback Program.

Impact

The bill is expected to impact state tax laws directly by modifying how vehicle trade-ins are assessed for taxation purposes. By integrating compensation payments from manufacturers into the trade-in value, consumers will benefit from a reduction in the overall tax they owe when purchasing a new vehicle. This approach not only encourages compliance with federal emission standards but also makes it easier for consumers to reinvest in newer, cleaner vehicles. The legislation reflects a holistic approach to environmental regulation and consumer relief.

Summary

House Bill 07315 pertains to the regulation of motor vehicle purchases, specifically within the context of a buyback program. This legislation allows individuals who trade in vehicles that are part of a court-approved settlement involving non-compliant emission standards to count compensation payments received from manufacturers as part of their vehicle's trade-in value. This change aims to alleviate the financial burden on consumers looking to purchase replacement vehicles by ensuring that they only pay sales tax on the difference between the sale price and the trade-in value.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding HB 07315 appears to be favorable. Legislators and advocacy groups focused on environmental issues have expressed support for the bill, recognizing its potential to aid consumers while promoting the transition to cleaner vehicles. However, there may be some contention among those wary of additional fiscal impacts on the state's revenue from reduced tax collections, suggesting a cautious optimism regarding the bill's broader implications on state finances.

Contention

One notable point of contention relates to the financial implications of waiving sales tax on the portion of the vehicle priced attributed to the compensation payments from automotive manufacturers. While supporters tout the benefits for consumers and the environment, opponents may argue that the idea could lead to decreased revenue for state tax collections. This could prompt debates over the sustainability of such tax incentives in future legislative sessions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.