Resolution Proposing A Constitutional Amendment Concerning Length Of Legislative Sessions.
Impact
If enacted, this change would have significant implications for how the General Assembly functions, effectively transforming it into a part-time legislature. This shift could lead to a reevaluation of legislative priorities and the overall efficiency of the General Assembly. Supporters might argue that a shorter session would afford representatives more time to engage with their constituents and manage their private affairs beyond politics, potentially leading to a more representative legislative process.
Summary
House Joint Resolution No. 11, proposed in January 2017, seeks to amend the state constitution regarding the length of legislative sessions for the General Assembly. The proposal aims to limit the sessions to forty-five days each calendar year. This amendment intends to establish a framework whereby the legislature operates as a part-time body, reevaluating the current structure and approach to legislative activities within the state.
Conclusion
In conclusion, HJ00011 aims to reshape the legislative landscape of the state significantly. While proponents hope for efficiency and better engagement with constituents, critics may raise concerns over the legislature's ability to adequately respond to the needs of the state within a restrictive timeframe. The resolution touches on broader themes of government reform and the balance between active governance and the role of elected officials.
Contention
Notably, the bill proposes a change in the compensation structure for members of the General Assembly, stipulating that they would receive a salary that corresponds with the shorter legislative session, along with the elimination of fringe benefits. This aspect of the proposal might be a point of contention, as it raises questions about the adequacy of compensation for the reduced session and the ability of the legislature to attract qualified candidates for office. Opposition views may envision potential downsides such as diminished legislative capabilities and a delay in addressing pressing state issues.
Resolution Proposing A State Constitutional Amendment To Allow Individuals Who Have Attained The Age Of Sixteen To Apply For Admission As Electors And To Be So Admitted Upon Attaining The Age Of Eighteen.
Resolution Proposing An Amendment To The State Constitution To Revise Requirements Relating To The Offering Of Bail Or Pretrial Release To Persons Accused Of A Crime.