Connecticut House Bill HJ00035

Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/19/17
• Refer: 1/19/17

Caption

Resolution Petitioning Congress To Convene An Article V Convention To Overturn The United States Supreme Court's Decision In Citizens United V. Federal Election Commission.

Impact

If passed, HJ00035 could initiate a process that allows states to influence the constitutional amendment process directly, thereby providing a means for states to express their opposition to the current interpretation of campaign finance laws as established by the Supreme Court. Proponents of the resolution argue that it is essential for restoring the integrity of the democratic process by limiting the overpowering influence of money in elections. Should the resolution succeed, it would represent a substantial shift in the landscape of American political funding and campaign finance regulation.

Summary

House Joint Resolution 35 petitions Congress to convene an Article V convention aimed at proposing an amendment to the United States Constitution to overturn the Supreme Court's decision in the landmark case of Citizens United v. Federal Election Commission. This resolution reflects a significant concern among certain lawmakers regarding the implications of the Citizens United ruling, which enabled corporations and unions to spend unlimited amounts of money on political campaigns, leading to claims of excessive influence of money in politics.

Contention

The movement toward an Article V convention has sparked debate regarding its feasibility and potential risks. Critics raise concerns about the unpredictability of a convention, fearing that it could lead to unintended changes in the Constitution beyond the intended scope of the amendment to address campaign finance. Proponents, however, argue that this method is a necessary recourse, given the perceived ineffectiveness of congressional action in addressing the issues stemming from Citizens United. This resolution underscores the ongoing discussions surrounding the influence of money in politics and the constitutional mechanisms available to amend that influence.