Connecticut Senate Bill SB00027

Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/9/17
• Refer: 1/9/17
• Refer: 2/8/17
• Report Pass: 3/2/17
• Refer: 3/9/17
• Report Pass: 3/13/17
• Refer: 5/3/17

Caption

An Act Including Certain Mental Or Emotional Impairments Within The Definition Of "personal Injury" Under The Workers' Compensation Statutes.

Impact

The passage of SB00027 would represent a significant shift in state workers' compensation law, allowing for mental health claims under circumstances where they are causally connected to employment. This adjustment means that employees who experience mental or emotional impairments due to work-related trauma would have recourse for benefits similar to those with physical injuries. The bill directs the state to purchase workers' compensation insurance specifically catering to these claims, ensuring that coverage is available for those who qualify under the new definitions.

Summary

Senate Bill 27 aims to expand the definition of 'personal injury' within the workers' compensation statutes to include certain mental and emotional impairments. Specifically, the bill recognizes that mental health issues, such as post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD), can arise as a direct result of employment-related incidents. This legislative change is particularly focused on first responders, such as police officers and firefighters, who may experience significant emotional trauma in the course of their duties. By including these types of injuries, the bill seeks to provide a broader safety net for workers affected by the psychological fallout of their jobs.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB00027 appears largely supportive, especially from advocacy groups focused on mental health and the well-being of first responders. Proponents argue that recognizing mental health issues as legitimate injuries will help destigmatize these conditions and ensure that affected workers receive the necessary support. However, there may also be concerns regarding the administrative burden and the potential for increased claims, which could raise insurance premiums for employers. Overall, the dialogue reflects a growing acknowledgment of the importance of mental health in workplace safety and employee welfare.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the potential for exploitation of the expanded definitions of personal injury and whether the criteria for qualifying for mental health claims are stringent enough to prevent misuse. Critics may raise concerns about the financial implications for the state's workforce compensation system and how it might affect employers. Additionally, discussions could emerge over the adequacy of mental health support services available to workers and the training of professionals tasked with diagnosing and treating such conditions.