Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00260

Introduced
1/18/17  
Introduced
1/18/17  
Refer
1/18/17  
Refer
3/16/17  
Refer
3/16/17  
Report Pass
3/17/17  
Report Pass
3/17/17  
Refer
3/30/17  
Refer
3/30/17  
Report Pass
4/5/17  
Report Pass
4/5/17  
Engrossed
5/23/17  
Engrossed
5/23/17  
Report Pass
5/24/17  
Report Pass
5/24/17  
Chaptered
6/12/17  
Chaptered
6/12/17  
Enrolled
6/16/17  
Enrolled
6/16/17  
Passed
6/27/17  

Caption

An Act Concerning Autonomous Vehicles.

Impact

The passage of SB00260 would create significant impacts on state transportation laws and regulatory frameworks. It initiates a pilot program in select municipalities that will allow autonomous vehicle testers to operate within defined parameters, which is essential for gathering data on safety and effectiveness. Ultimately, this bill paves the way for future legal standards and regulations pertinent to autonomous vehicle operation, balancing innovation with public safety. Additionally, it mandates annual reporting to monitor the pilot program's implementation and outcomes, fostering accountability and transparency.

Summary

Senate Bill 00260, titled 'An Act Concerning Autonomous Vehicles,' seeks to establish a framework for testing and regulating fully autonomous vehicles within the state. The bill defines what constitutes a fully autonomous vehicle, identifies the roles and responsibilities of 'testers' (those entities authorized to test autonomous vehicles) and outlines the requirements for pilot programs to evaluate these technologies in real-world conditions. The primary goal is to ensure a systematic approach to incorporating these advanced vehicles while promoting safety and compliance with state laws.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB00260 appears to be cautiously optimistic. Supporters, including various stakeholders in the automotive and tech industries, argue that the bill represents a progressive step towards embracing technological advancements that could enhance transportation efficiency and safety. However, there are concerns regarding potential risks associated with autonomous vehicles, including user safety and data privacy, which have prompted some skepticism among public interest groups and certain legislators.

Contention

Significant points of contention arise regarding the balance between innovation and regulation. Critics of the bill highlight potential safety hazards inherent in autonomous vehicle testing, stressing the importance of thorough regulatory oversight to prevent accidents and ensure public safety. Moreover, discussions surrounding the task force established by the bill could lead to further debate about the adequacy of stakeholder representation, especially concerning public opinion and local governance. The tension between fostering technological innovation and prioritizing safety regulations remains central to the discourse surrounding this bill.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1282

Transportation Permitting Task Force.

LA HB250

Restructures offices within DOTD

WV SB610

Relating to duties, powers and responsibilities of DOT Secretary

CA AB2919

Transportation: permits.

CA SB1067

Department of Motor Vehicles.

CA AB419

Food and agriculture.

CA AB1343

Local alternative transportation improvement program: Feather River crossing.

CA SB66

California Council on the Future of Transportation: advisory committee: autonomous vehicle technology.