Connecticut Senate Bill SB00268

Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/18/17
• Refer: 1/18/17

Caption

An Act Requiring State Employee Collective Bargaining Agreements And Arbitration Awards To Be Approved By The General Assembly.

Impact

If enacted, SB00268 would alter the current process by eliminating the autonomy of certain state entities in finalizing labor agreements. Proponents argue that this will promote transparency and accountability, allowing elected representatives to have a say in matters that can significantly affect state finances. Additionally, supporters believe that legislative scrutiny on collective bargaining agreements may foster more prudent fiscal management regarding employee compensation and benefits, aligning them with the state’s economic capabilities.

Summary

SB00268, introduced by Senators Fasano and Witkos, aims to amend existing legislative processes regarding collective bargaining agreements and arbitration awards for state employees. The bill requires that all such agreements and awards receive approval from both chambers of the General Assembly before they can take effect. This move seeks to enhance oversight of state employee contracts and ensure legislative input into the negotiations that impact state budgets and workforce management.

Contention

The bill has sparked debate regarding its implications for labor relations within the state. Opponents express concern that requiring legislative approval could hinder efficient negotiations and disrupt the timely establishment of contracts during labor disputes. Critics argue that this could lead to delays in reaching agreements that are vital for maintaining harmony between the state and its workforce, potentially affecting public service delivery. Furthermore, there is apprehension that political considerations might influence approvals, overshadowing the needs and rights of employees.

Additional_notes

The voting history suggests limited discussion or opposition during initial reviews, with no formal tally recorded for the initial voting session. This may indicate a lack of urgency or consensus surrounding the bill at its introduction stage.