Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00445

Introduced
1/19/17  
Refer
1/19/17  
Refer
1/19/17  
Refer
3/24/17  
Refer
3/24/17  
Report Pass
3/27/17  
Report Pass
3/27/17  
Refer
4/5/17  
Refer
4/5/17  
Report Pass
4/11/17  
Report Pass
4/11/17  
Refer
5/3/17  
Refer
5/3/17  
Report Pass
5/9/17  
Report Pass
5/9/17  
Report Pass
5/10/17  
Report Pass
5/10/17  
Engrossed
5/24/17  
Engrossed
5/24/17  
Report Pass
5/26/17  
Report Pass
5/26/17  
Chaptered
6/26/17  
Chaptered
6/26/17  
Enrolled
6/29/17  
Enrolled
6/29/17  

Caption

An Act Concerning Contracts Between A Pharmacy And A Pharmacy Benefits Manager, The Bidirectional Exchange Of Electronic Health Records And The Charging Of Facility Fees By A Hospital Or Health System.

Impact

The bill's provisions require hospitals and health systems to provide clear, written notifications to patients about facility fees that might be charged when receiving services at hospital-based facilities. It mandates disclosures about the potential financial liabilities that patients may incur, promoting patient knowledge and allowing for informed choices. If enacted, these regulations would enhance consumer rights to financial information, thereby impacting how hospitals communicate costs and manage billing procedures.

Summary

Senate Bill 00445 aims to improve the transparency and accessibility of healthcare costs related to facility fees, as well as the exchange of electronic health records between providers and hospitals. The bill prohibits pharmacy benefits managers and health carriers from including provisions in contracts that prevent pharmacists from disclosing prices or alternatives for medications to consumers. This is intended to empower patients to make informed choices about their healthcare based on cost, which is particularly significant as the healthcare landscape evolves towards greater consumer involvement in decision-making.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding SB00445 appears to lean positive, particularly among advocates for consumer rights and transparency in healthcare. Proponents argue that the bill addresses a critical gap in healthcare transparency, which is essential for patient empowerment. However, there is potential concern from healthcare providers about the increased administrative burden these requirements may introduce and whether they could complicate existing operations within hospital systems.

Contention

A noteworthy point of contention is the balance between providing patients with necessary information and the potential increase in operational complexities for hospitals. Critics may argue that the additional transparency could lead to confusion or increased complaints from patients regarding billing, while supporters believe that better-informed patients will help reduce unnecessary costs and improve healthcare outcomes.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CT HB05053

An Act Concerning Opioids And Access To Overdose Reversal Drugs.

MI SB0680

Health: occupations; licensing sanctions for compliance with death with dignity act; prohibit under certain circumstances. Amends secs. 17752 & 20175 of 1978 PA 368 (MCL 333.17752 & 333.20175) & adds sec. 16221c. TIE BAR WITH: SB 0681'23

AZ SB1457

Psychologists; prescribing authority

IN SB0284

Telehealth matters.

CT HB06001

An Act Concerning Telehealth.

CT SB00069

An Act Exempting Veterinarians From The Electronic Prescription Drug Monitoring Program.

CT HB06669

An Act Protecting Patients And Prohibiting Unnecessary Health Care Costs.

CT HB05596

An Act Concerning Telehealth.