Connecticut Senate Bill SB00709

Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

• Introduced: 1/25/17
• Refer: 1/25/17

Caption

An Act Lowering Of The Excess Cost Threshold For Special Education Costs.

Impact

If passed, this bill would have a significant impact on state laws related to education funding and special education services. By lowering the reimbursement threshold, the legislation would allow local school districts to receive state reimbursements for a larger portion of their special education expenditures. This adjustment could potentially lead to improved resource allocation, enabling schools to provide better support and services to students who require special education. Such a change could foster a more inclusive environment for students with disabilities as localities might be able to afford more comprehensive educational programs.

Summary

Senate Bill 709, also known as the Act Lowering Of The Excess Cost Threshold For Special Education Costs, aims to adjust the reimbursement threshold for special education expenses incurred by local school districts. The bill proposes to reduce the current threshold from four and one-half times the average per pupil cost to three times the average per pupil cost. This change is intended to alleviate some of the financial burdens faced by localities in funding special education services, making it easier for schools to meet the needs of their students with disabilities without incurring excessive costs.

Conclusion

Overall, SB 709 reflects an important legislative attempt to modify the existing framework for special education funding in Connecticut. The bill seeks to provide increased assistance to local districts tasked with supporting students with special needs, fostering a more equitable educational landscape. The discussion surrounding its passage is likely to be influenced by broader debates on education funding priorities and state budget allocations.

Contention

While supporters of SB 709 argue that reducing the reimbursement threshold is a necessary move to support local education initiatives, there may be contention surrounding the bill related to funding sources and budget constraints. Critics may express concerns regarding the sustainability of state reimbursements, particularly in times of tight budgets. They might argue that while this bill addresses an immediate need, it does not provide a long-term solution to the funding challenges faced by special education programs.