Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00822

Introduced
2/16/17  
Refer
2/16/17  

Caption

An Act Concerning Consumer Contracts.

Impact

The bill's enforcement transforms how consumer contracts are drafted and presented. By requiring that contracts are written in 'plain language,' the legislation aims to eliminate confusion and make terms more accessible to the average consumer. This aspect is particularly focused on protecting seniors, who may have been disproportionately affected by convoluted contract language. The law also establishes maximum fees for social referral services, thereby preventing exploitation of consumers through exorbitant charges. The bill further extends protections by nullifying penalty clauses if a consumer aged 60 or older passes away before the contract's termination, ensuring fairness to the families left behind.

Summary

SB00822 is a bill aimed at enhancing consumer protections, specifically in the context of consumer contracts related to social referral services and weight loss programs. The legislation mandates that all such contracts include a clear 'NOTICE OF CANCELLATION' section, which informs consumers of their rights to cancel the contract without penalties within three business days. Ensuring consumers, especially seniors, are aware of their cancellation rights is central to addressing issues related to potentially misleading contracts that can have detrimental financial impacts on vulnerable populations. Furthermore, the bill stipulates that any services relating to these contracts must adhere to stringent refund policies, thereby tightening the accountability of the sellers.

Contention

Debate around SB00822 has highlighted points of contention regarding its implications for businesses offering referral services. While proponents view the legislation as a necessary step towards consumer protection, particularly for seniors, critics argue that it could overregulate small businesses, particularly those who rely on social referral contracts as a revenue source. The requirement for refunds and clarity in contract language has raised concerns about increased operational costs for service providers. As discussions evolve, it remains crucial to balance consumer rights with the operational realities of businesses, ensuring that the legislative outcome supports both consumers and responsible business practices.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB954

Dental services: third-party network access.

DC B25-0265

Contract No. GAGA-2022-C-0259 with SodexoMagic, LLC Approval and Payment Authorization Emergency Act of 2023

TX SB543

Relating to oversight of and requirements applicable to state contracts and other state financial and accounting issues; authorizing fees.

TX HB1426

Relating to certain requirements applicable to contracts entered into by, and the contract management process of, state agencies.

MS HB934

Healthcare Contracting Simplification Act; create.

NJ S3443

Requires State Contract Managers to monitor work conducted by subcontractors on State contracts.

NJ A4487

Requires State Contract Managers to monitor work conducted by subcontractors on State contracts.

CA SB681

Public employees’ retirement: contracting agencies: termination.