Connecticut 2017 Regular Session

Connecticut Senate Bill SB00961

Introduced
3/2/17  
Introduced
3/2/17  
Refer
3/2/17  
Report Pass
3/16/17  
Report Pass
3/16/17  
Refer
3/27/17  
Refer
3/27/17  
Report Pass
4/3/17  
Report Pass
4/3/17  
Engrossed
4/19/17  
Engrossed
4/19/17  
Report Pass
4/20/17  
Report Pass
4/20/17  
Chaptered
6/19/17  
Chaptered
6/19/17  
Enrolled
6/23/17  
Enrolled
6/23/17  
Passed
7/7/17  

Caption

An Act Concerning State Historical Museums And The Relocation Of Businesses Receiving Financial Assistance From The State.

Impact

In terms of economic implications, SB00961 establishes specific conditions under which businesses receiving financial assistance cannot relocate outside of Connecticut for a set period of time. This measure is designed to safeguard local employment and retain businesses that might otherwise contribute to economic instability in the state. Should a business decide to relocate, it would be required to repay the assistance received along with a penalty. These provisions aim to create a more stable economic framework while promoting historical tourism through better management of state historical sites.

Summary

SB00961, also known as 'An Act Concerning State Historical Museums and the Relocation of Businesses Receiving Financial Assistance from the State,' aims to address two main areas: the governance of state historical museums and the conditions under which businesses that receive state financial assistance can relocate. The bill seeks to establish a Historic Preservation Council, which will be responsible for overseeing the preservation and promotion of historical sites in Connecticut. It outlines the council's powers, including advising on preservation, maintaining a state register of historic places, and operating state historical museums. This framework is intended to enhance the management and recognition of the state's historical resources.

Sentiment

The reception of SB00961 appears to be generally supportive, particularly from stakeholders who value historical preservation and economic development. Proponents of the bill advocate that it balances the need for economic incentives for businesses with the commitment to preserving Connecticut's rich historical legacy. However, discussions surrounding the relocation terms may spark dissent from business owners who view such restrictions as burdensome, potentially limiting their operational flexibility. Therefore, while the bill is aimed at promoting community stability, some apprehensions about the potential overreach into business practices have been noted.

Contention

One notable point of contention revolves around the duration of the relocation restrictions imposed on businesses receiving state financial assistance. Critics might assert that this could deter businesses from seeking financial aid altogether due to fears of punitive measures if relocation is necessary. Furthermore, the intricacies of enforcing these conditions could lead to logistical challenges for the Department of Economic and Community Development, as they assess compliance with the bill's stipulations. The debate encapsulates a larger conversation about the interplay between economic growth policies and the preservation of community and historical values.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

No similar bills found.